2012
DOI: 10.1177/0266666912454025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On considering the application of Amartya Sen's capability approach to an information-based rights framework

Abstract: We live in an information society, and, resultantly, significant attention is devoted to ensure ‗‗information-based rights'' are protected among other essential human rights.Fostering and protecting information-based rights is essential to human well being, and the traditional strategies to support these rights focus on ensuring free and unfettered access to information, such as the right to education, the freedom to read, or providing for fair use of copyright-protected works. While ensuring informational goo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…De George [15], Britz [4,5], Tavani [56], van Dijk [58,59], and Floridi [22] provide connections between philosophical theory and contemporary information society contexts, which informs our perspective and empirical investigation.…”
Section: The Digital Divide Broadband Affordability and Social Justicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…De George [15], Britz [4,5], Tavani [56], van Dijk [58,59], and Floridi [22] provide connections between philosophical theory and contemporary information society contexts, which informs our perspective and empirical investigation.…”
Section: The Digital Divide Broadband Affordability and Social Justicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The other opinion is that systems for protecting information rights are essential to human wellbeing [24]. Some authors argue that the confidentiality of information is necessary for businesses to maintain their competitive advantage [3].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, Rawls's work is often contrasted against an already existing critique-most commonly, Sen's "capabilities approach"-in order to better illustrate the alternative position. Examples of this approach include: capabilities analyses of morality and robots as caretakers (Borenstein & Pearson, 2010;Vallor, 2011);Coeckelbergh's (2011) articulation of the capabilities approach as a suitable foundation for a comprehensive "ethical-anthropological framework"; Johnstone's (2007) application of the capabilities approach for normative analyses of technology generally; and Britz, Hoffmann, Ponelis, Zimmer, and Lor's (2013) discussion of capabilities in an information-based rights framework. Outside of capabilities discussions, Rawls is also cited as incompatible with a feminist ethics of care (Capurro, 2008;Froelich, 2004).…”
Section: Rawls As Oppositional Figurementioning
confidence: 99%