IEEE INFOCOM 2016 - The 35th Annual IEEE International Conference on Computer Communications 2016
DOI: 10.1109/infocom.2016.7524332
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On consistent migration of flows in SDNs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
46
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Flow migration (FM) in SDN has recently received some attention [9], [10], [5], [11]. In [9], each packet or flow is stamped with a version number to refer to old or new forwarding rules, and a packet/flow is solely routed with regard to one set of rules.…”
Section: B Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Flow migration (FM) in SDN has recently received some attention [9], [10], [5], [11]. In [9], each packet or flow is stamped with a version number to refer to old or new forwarding rules, and a packet/flow is solely routed with regard to one set of rules.…”
Section: B Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To address this, certain flows are assumed rate-limited to enable a conflict-free FM. Brandt et al show that given a network flow configuration, there is a polynomial-time algorithm to decide if a congestion-free migration is possible for the case of splittable flows [11]. However, they mention that the decision problem is NP-hard if all flows must be integer or are unsplittable.…”
Section: B Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dudycz et al [3] show that simultaneously computing two network updates while requiring a minimal number of switch updates ("touches") is NP-hard. Brandt et al [2] give a polynomial algorithm to decide if congestion-free update is possible when flows are "splittable" and/or not restricted to be integer.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, migrating multiple flows at the same time in a provably congestion-free manner without making any assumptions about the timing of these updates at switches is a challenging problem and has been thoroughly investigated. It was shown in [36] that instead of performing forwarding rule update in a single step there often exists a sequence of consistent network updates (i.e., congestion-free and without temporary demand reduction [29]) that deploys the desired flows in the network. A polynomialtime algorithm was introduced in [36] to decide whether a consistent sequence of forwarding rule updates (i.e., migration plan) exists or not.…”
Section: A Alert-based Reconfiguration Of Network Connectivitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was shown in [36] that instead of performing forwarding rule update in a single step there often exists a sequence of consistent network updates (i.e., congestion-free and without temporary demand reduction [29]) that deploys the desired flows in the network. A polynomialtime algorithm was introduced in [36] to decide whether a consistent sequence of forwarding rule updates (i.e., migration plan) exists or not. However, if the flows are not allowed to be split -flows have to be switched at once or in integer parts from the current to their desired paths -then it is NP-hard to decide whether such a migration plan exists or not.…”
Section: A Alert-based Reconfiguration Of Network Connectivitymentioning
confidence: 99%