1962
DOI: 10.1080/00206816209473747
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On Continental Drift (From Paleomagnetic Data)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1966
1966
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Both Irving (6) and Rezanov (7) describe serious inaccuracies in the methods used; to these inaccuracies Rezanov attributes errors of 2000 kilometers in the proposed locations of the paleopoles. Both Irving (6) and Rezanov (7) describe serious inaccuracies in the methods used; to these inaccuracies Rezanov attributes errors of 2000 kilometers in the proposed locations of the paleopoles.…”
Section: Onset Of Glaciationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both Irving (6) and Rezanov (7) describe serious inaccuracies in the methods used; to these inaccuracies Rezanov attributes errors of 2000 kilometers in the proposed locations of the paleopoles. Both Irving (6) and Rezanov (7) describe serious inaccuracies in the methods used; to these inaccuracies Rezanov attributes errors of 2000 kilometers in the proposed locations of the paleopoles.…”
Section: Onset Of Glaciationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…) to relate the observed differences in the positions of the paleomag netic poles of the coeval rocks of the different (tecton ically incoherent) crustal blocks, including the conti nental ones, to the continental drift have faced exten sive criticism. A particular focus of the criticism laid in the accuracy and datings of the paleomagnetic deter minations (Rezanov, 1961;1968;Meyerhoff, 1979). The conclusion of these authors was quite cer tain: "…the paleomagnetic determinations have been so inaccurate and controversial that they cannot be used as arguments validating or refuting the hypothesis of the relative displacements of continents or their parts" (Rezanov, 1968, p. 47).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%