Computational Mathematical Programming 1985
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-82450-0_9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On Converting Optimal Control Problems into Nonlinear Programming Problems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
74
0
2

Year Published

1993
1993
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 149 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
74
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Some of the basic ideas of this discretization scheme have been formerly outlined by Kraft [14] and Hargraves and Paris [11]. A discretization of the time interval 0 = t 1 < t 2 < .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of the basic ideas of this discretization scheme have been formerly outlined by Kraft [14] and Hargraves and Paris [11]. A discretization of the time interval 0 = t 1 < t 2 < .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are three basic approaches for addressing optimal control problems, that is, DP, direct methods [24,25] and indirect methods [26,27]. DP adopts the principle of optimality of subarcs to recursively compute feedback control.…”
Section: Dynamic Programming (Dp) Implementationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Direct methods, on the other hand, rely on a priori discretization of the control trajectories. Two main classes of direct methods are (i) the simultaneous method, where the dynamic model is also discretized, using e.g., collocation techniques and extra optimization variables [4], to arrive at a fully algebraic model and (ii) the sequential method, where the dynamic model is retained, and instead is resolved using numerical integration [5]. The focus in this work is on the sequential method that has shown capabilities for handling large-scale, stiff problems with high accuracy [6], arguably due to keeping the problem dimension relatively small [7] and the use of adaptive numerical integrators furnished with error control mechanisms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%