2012
DOI: 10.1007/s00703-012-0215-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On correcting precipitation as simulated by the regional climate model COSMO-CLM with daily rain gauge observations

Abstract: Precipitation amounts simulated by the regional climate model COSMO-CLM are compared with observations from rain gauges at German precipitation stations for the period 1960-2000. The model overestimates precipitation by about 26 %. This bias is accompanied with a shift of the frequency distribution of rain intensities. The model overestimation varies regionally. A correction function is derived which adjusts rain intensities at every model grid point to the observations.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Even though each gridded climate data set incorporates information derived from station‐based climate observations, the reliability of the data vary with the quality and density of observing stations and the topography of the region. Therefore, additional comparisons of each gridded data set with reliable observational data were necessary to identify the most consistent gridded data set corresponding to the different seasons and regions within the ARB (Petrik et al ., ; Lindau and Simmer, ). Observational station data employed in these data sets were obtained from (1) the study of Mekis and Vincent (), who adjusted daily rainfall and snowfall data for 450 stations over Canada that account for not only wind undercatch and evaporation and wetting losses for each type of rain gauges but also a density correction from a set of coincident ruler measurements and Nipher gauge observations for snowfall stations and (ii) the study of Vincent et al .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even though each gridded climate data set incorporates information derived from station‐based climate observations, the reliability of the data vary with the quality and density of observing stations and the topography of the region. Therefore, additional comparisons of each gridded data set with reliable observational data were necessary to identify the most consistent gridded data set corresponding to the different seasons and regions within the ARB (Petrik et al ., ; Lindau and Simmer, ). Observational station data employed in these data sets were obtained from (1) the study of Mekis and Vincent (), who adjusted daily rainfall and snowfall data for 450 stations over Canada that account for not only wind undercatch and evaporation and wetting losses for each type of rain gauges but also a density correction from a set of coincident ruler measurements and Nipher gauge observations for snowfall stations and (ii) the study of Vincent et al .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Long-term, large-scale precipitation records guide decisions related to water resource management; short-term, finescale measurements are mandatory for accurate predictions of flash floods. Accurate QPE may also lead to improved precipitation forecasts by means of data assimilation in numerical weather prediction (NWP) models (e.g., Milan et al 2008Milan et al , 2014, for the verification of weather forecast and climate models (e.g., Bachner et al 2008;Lindau and Simmer 2013), and development of statistical forecasting tools, such as model output statistics (MOS). Precipitation radars have the potential to provide the fields of precipitation rate with high temporal and spatial resolution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also the simulated seasonal patterns compare well with REGNIE, but the virtual reality overestimates precipitation over the mountains and the south-eastern part of the Neckar catchment. Such differences have also been found for COSMO coupled to its own TERRA land surface model with the same spatial resolution (e.g., Dierer et al, 2009;Lindau and Simmer, 2013). During summer (June to August) cloud bases are usually higher and reduce luff-lee effects.…”
Section: Precipitationmentioning
confidence: 58%