Science Fiction Criticism 2017
DOI: 10.5040/9781474248655.0013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On defining sf, or not: Genre theory, sf, and history

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
18
0
4

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
18
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Questions around genre and its significance have often been debated, with genre theory largely moving from formalist to historical orientations (Rieder, 2010: 191), which are not specific to chick-lit. What is important for understanding chick-lit as a type of popular fiction is the attendant associations that cohere around it as a maligned genre (see: Butler and Desai, 2008; Harzewski, 2011) despite its transnational popularity.…”
Section: Genrementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Questions around genre and its significance have often been debated, with genre theory largely moving from formalist to historical orientations (Rieder, 2010: 191), which are not specific to chick-lit. What is important for understanding chick-lit as a type of popular fiction is the attendant associations that cohere around it as a maligned genre (see: Butler and Desai, 2008; Harzewski, 2011) despite its transnational popularity.…”
Section: Genrementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Trexler and Johns-Putra (2011) maintain that while a variety of earlier novels on climate change starting in the 1960s could be considered SF, more recent CF falls into several genre categories, including thriller and literary fiction (see Trexler & Johns-Putra, 2011). The contours of SF have been a focus of many debates and commentaries that are beyond the scope of this article (see, e.g., Booker & Thomas, 2009; Canavan, 2014; James & Mendelsohn, 2003; Milner, 2012; Parrinder, 2000; Rieder, 2010; Thomas, 2013). While there may be disagreement about the fiction family to which individual CF novels belong (see Atwood, 2013; Haq, 2013; Trexler, 2015; Trexler & Johns-Putra, 2011), there are important connections between CF and SF that allow us to discuss the former within the SF domain.…”
Section: Climate Fiction and Science Fictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While there may be disagreement about the fiction family to which individual CF novels belong (see Atwood, 2013; Haq, 2013; Trexler, 2015; Trexler & Johns-Putra, 2011), there are important connections between CF and SF that allow us to discuss the former within the SF domain. We start from the understanding that the boundaries of SF are “historical and mutable” (Rieder, 2010, p. 22) and “continuously reinvented” (Milner, 2012, p. 39; see also Mendelsohn, 2003). At the same time, SF has features that make it better positioned to explore the political, scientific, and cultural dimensions of climate change (Tuhus-Dubrow 2013; Trexler & Johns-Putra, 2011).…”
Section: Climate Fiction and Science Fictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Historically, science fiction and fantasy has transgressed the division between the popular and the literary, often being defined less by taxonomic generic features than through the 'communities of practice' that produce and consume it: those associated with gaming, comics, online transnational popular magazines, as well as more conventionally literary texts. 35 Science fiction and fantasy might at first sight seem to have less to say about history than the realist novel, which is more tightly bound to Munslow's 'agreed facts of the past'. 36 Matt Hills, however, has argued that the way in which science fiction plays with time and creates new worlds represents a profound engagement with the process of telling history.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%