2012
DOI: 10.4000/rlv.2104
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On definite kinds1

Abstract: In this paper we defend three hypotheses. First, all languages that have Determiners (null or overt) have deinite kinds, a possibility which does not prevent languages from using other means to refer to kinds. Second, kinds are referred to by deinite DPs with no Number involved. Third, the subkind interpretation is built on Number. We will provide empirical support for these hypotheses based on a contrastive analysis of two languages that show opposite strategies for marking deiniteness: Spanish, a Romance lan… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
3

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
4
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Definite kinds (e.g., Spanish El colibrí está en todas partes lit. the hummingbird is in every parts ‘The hummingbird is everywhere’) illustrate the former (Borik & Espinal , ), for which it has been postulated that the D combines directly with the N with no intervening Number, the output meaning being that the iota operator turns properties of kinds into kind expressions. Bare nominals in object position of have‐ predicates (e.g., Spanish llevar bolso lit.…”
Section: Number In the Generative Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Definite kinds (e.g., Spanish El colibrí está en todas partes lit. the hummingbird is in every parts ‘The hummingbird is everywhere’) illustrate the former (Borik & Espinal , ), for which it has been postulated that the D combines directly with the N with no intervening Number, the output meaning being that the iota operator turns properties of kinds into kind expressions. Bare nominals in object position of have‐ predicates (e.g., Spanish llevar bolso lit.…”
Section: Number In the Generative Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…iii) La construcción de un nombre genérico, que alude a toda la clase de entidades, con estos sustantivos implica siempre la eliminación del femenino. Como es bien sabido, en (44a) es posible interpretar el sustantivo como denotador de la clase total a la que se refiere el nombre léxico (Borik y Espinal, 2012, 2015, mientras que en (44b) solo se alude a las entidades hembra dentro de la clase de entidades. iv) La combinación de estos sustantivos con el diminutivo -it-no implica cambio en el morfema final del sustantivo.…”
Section: Región De Clasificadores Nominalesunclassified
“…We assume that in languages like English, definite kinds of the type exemplified in (8) express D-genericity (cf. Krifka et al 1995) and are composed by applying the iota operator i to the denotation of a common noun, which denotes properties of kinds (see Borik & Espinal 2012 of definite kinds in Spanish). This proposal might be conceived as a universal principle, no matter whether the languages considered have overt articles (such as English or Spanish) or not (such as Russian).…”
Section: On the Definiteness Of Preverbal Bare Nominals In Russianmentioning
confidence: 99%