1997
DOI: 10.5802/aif.1589
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On deformation method in invariant theory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The following condition on submonoids of Λ + was considered by D. Panyushev in [25]. It also occurs in [29].…”
Section: Further Results and Notions Frommentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The following condition on submonoids of Λ + was considered by D. Panyushev in [25]. It also occurs in [29].…”
Section: Further Results and Notions Frommentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the first step, let us denote the maximal unipotent subgroup of SL n of lower triangular matrices by U , the opposite maximal unipotent subgroup of upper triangular matrices by U o and the normalizing maximal torus by T . By Theorem 0.2 of [22], the algebra C[X×Y ] SLn is a deformation of (C[X] U ⊗C[Y ] U o ) T for affine varieties X, Y and both algebras share the same Hilbert series with respect to a common SL n -stable grading. We explicitly compute the algebra…”
Section: The Serial Casesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that λ(G/H) ≤λ(G/H) since BH is dense in G, and more generally Z λ(G/H) ∩ P + ≤ λ(G/H) ( [34], part 2 of the proof of Proposition 1.5). Moreover…”
Section: Definition 32 We Putλ(g/h)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We shall prove the crucial fact thatλ [34], Definition 1.3). In the following, x is a fixed element in O ∩ wB andẇ a representative of w in N such that x =ẇu, u ∈ U .…”
Section: We Describeλ(o) For This Purpose We Denote Bymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation