Abstract:Let S = S 1 , ..., S m be a system of contracting similarities of R 2 . The attractor K(S) of the system S is a non-empty compact set satisfying K = S 1 (K) ∪ ... ∪ S m (K). We consider contractible polygonal systems S which are defined by a finite family of polygons whose intersection graph is a tree and therefore the attractor K(S) is a dendrite. We find conditions under which a deformation S of a contractible polygonal system S has the same intersection graph and therefore the attractor K(S ) is a self-simi… Show more
“…There are a lot of recent papers on fractal squares, mainly by Chinese authors. See [15,24,34,42,43,[50][51][52] and their references. The automaton for fractal squares is the same as for the corresponding square, with fewer edge labels.…”
Section: More Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So we must ask for characteristic exponents rather than absolute invariants. A first step would be to characterize contractible spaces which include trees [15] and disk-like tiles [1,29,32,49].…”
Finite automata were used to determine multiple addresses in number systems
and to find topological properties of self-affine tiles and finite type
fractals. We join these two lines of research by axiomatically defining
automata which generate topological spaces. Simple examples show the potential
of the concept. Spaces generated by automata are topologically self-similar.
Two basic algorithms are outlined. The first one determines automata for all
$k$-tuples of equivalent addresses from the automaton for double addresses. The
second one constructs finite topological spaces which approximate the generated
space. Finally, we discuss the realization of automata-generated spaces as
self-similar sets.
“…There are a lot of recent papers on fractal squares, mainly by Chinese authors. See [15,24,34,42,43,[50][51][52] and their references. The automaton for fractal squares is the same as for the corresponding square, with fewer edge labels.…”
Section: More Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So we must ask for characteristic exponents rather than absolute invariants. A first step would be to characterize contractible spaces which include trees [15] and disk-like tiles [1,29,32,49].…”
Finite automata were used to determine multiple addresses in number systems
and to find topological properties of self-affine tiles and finite type
fractals. We join these two lines of research by axiomatically defining
automata which generate topological spaces. Simple examples show the potential
of the concept. Spaces generated by automata are topologically self-similar.
Two basic algorithms are outlined. The first one determines automata for all
$k$-tuples of equivalent addresses from the automaton for double addresses. The
second one constructs finite topological spaces which approximate the generated
space. Finally, we discuss the realization of automata-generated spaces as
self-similar sets.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.