2016
DOI: 10.1017/s0305004116000293
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On deformation spaces of nonuniform hyperbolic lattices

Abstract: Let $\Gamma$ be a nonuniform lattice acting on real hyperbolic n-space. We show that in dimension greater than or equal to 4, the volume of a representation is constant on each connected component of the representation variety of $\Gamma$ in SO(n,1). Furthermore, in dimensions 2 and 3, there is a semialgebraic subset of the representation variety such that the volume of a representation is constant on connected components of the semialgebraic subset. Our approach gives a new proof of the local rigidity theorem… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, the second author also showed that the rigidity holds for complex and quaternionic lattices [Sav20]). The interest in the study of volume of representations has recently grown, leading to the development of a rich literature [Poz15], [KK16], [Tho18], [Far], [Far20].…”
Section: Historical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the second author also showed that the rigidity holds for complex and quaternionic lattices [Sav20]). The interest in the study of volume of representations has recently grown, leading to the development of a rich literature [Poz15], [KK16], [Tho18], [Far], [Far20].…”
Section: Historical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where [M] is the generator of H n (M, R) ∼ = H n (Γ, R) given by the fundamental class and ρ * (ω n ) ∈ H n (Γ, R) is the pullback of ω n . This definition has been extended to the non-compact case by various authors [Dun99, Fra04, BIW10, KK12a, BBI13], and the equivalence of these definitions has been recently established in [KK13]. We will use the cohomological definition introduced in [BBI13], which parallels the definition for surface groups given in [BIW10], and we briefly recall it here (for more details see § 4).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If M is non-compact, the situation parallels the one above, at least in high dimension. In fact, using an approach via Schläfli's formula as in [BCG07], Kim and Kim proved that if M is a finite volume hyperbolic manifold of dimension ≥ 4, the volume is constant on the connected components of Hom(π 1 (M), Isom + (H n )) [KK13]. Like in the compact case, in odd dimension the nature of these values is mysterious.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a more general setting, Francaviglia and Klaff [FK06] proved some similar rigidity results for their definition of volume of a representation Γ → PO(m, 1), this time assuming m ≥ n ≥ 3 (the rigidity of volume actually holds also at infinity, as proved by Francaviglia and the second author [FS18] for the real hyperbolic lattices: Moreover, the second author also showed that the rigidity holds for complex and quaternionic lattices [Sav18]). The interest in the study of volume of representations has recently grown, leading to the development of a rich literature [Poz15,KK16,Tho18,Fara,Farb].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%