2021
DOI: 10.24251/hicss.2021.202
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On-demand Shared Digital Twins – An Information Architectural Model to Create Transparency in Collaborative Supply Networks

Abstract: Industrial companies already apply digital twins for the digital representation of the physical world. In addition, information sharing becomes increasingly decisive for the competition, e.g. in supply networks where products and logistics data such as demands and capacities are exchanged. As many companies are, however, highly reluctant to share data across the supply chain, this paper applies the methodology of design science research to, first, state the requirements for shared digital twins based on five i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Främling et al (2013) discussed that GS1 EPCIS can be too complex or costly to implement compared to the promised benefits. This is confirmed by other studies that implementing standards can impose a big investment burden for SMEs due to the required technical solutions for bridging the information model adopted by each of these companies with the global standard agreed by the network (Cirullies & Schwede, 2021;Ferreira et al, 2012;Kazantsev et al, 2022;Scholz et al, 2018). Furthermore, Andreeva et al (2016) and Debicki and Kolinski (2019) also argued that even though there exists a common transmission protocol and API message format like JSON, the effort to reconcile and foster semantic interoperability between these standards can be cumbersome.…”
Section: Syntactic Interoperability Semantic Interoperability and Sta...mentioning
confidence: 71%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Främling et al (2013) discussed that GS1 EPCIS can be too complex or costly to implement compared to the promised benefits. This is confirmed by other studies that implementing standards can impose a big investment burden for SMEs due to the required technical solutions for bridging the information model adopted by each of these companies with the global standard agreed by the network (Cirullies & Schwede, 2021;Ferreira et al, 2012;Kazantsev et al, 2022;Scholz et al, 2018). Furthermore, Andreeva et al (2016) and Debicki and Kolinski (2019) also argued that even though there exists a common transmission protocol and API message format like JSON, the effort to reconcile and foster semantic interoperability between these standards can be cumbersome.…”
Section: Syntactic Interoperability Semantic Interoperability and Sta...mentioning
confidence: 71%
“…The first one is the Connector Store, which provides a repository of mappings for network participants to facilitate data exchange between heterogenous ICT environments. The second one is the Interoperability Simulator, which simulates collaboration opportunities between participants prior to implementation and might combine the Digital Twin and the IDS principles for simulating the interoperability within the network as demonstrated by Cirullies and Schwede (2021). This thesis aims to realize the former to support the connection between stakeholders in the Dutch logistics sector according to the IDS principles and realize an interoperable and sovereign data space for the participants.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the inter-organizational sphere, Data Space Data Catalogs enable the metadata-based inventory and discovery of data products to be shared between organizations in data spaces. Next to the functional semantic description of available data sources they allow for the definition and assessment of accessibility information and usage conditions for other organizations [6]. They do not hold the data itself as organizations want to preserve their data sovereignty and K therefore neglect the transfer of data to central platforms before the actual exchange.…”
Section: A Typology Of Data Catalog Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They split their framework into four major components: data collection, data integration, multi-agent decision making and dynamic network analysis. Lastly, [21] define an on-demand shared digital twin for supply chain management. They raise several key problems: (i) data sovereignty issues may happen along the chains, especially global ones and (ii) data formats should be as interoperable as possible, maybe even language and model agnostic.…”
Section: Connected Supply Chain Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%