Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Multi-Hop Ad Hoc Networks: From Theory to Reality 2006
DOI: 10.1145/1132983.1133006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On-demand software management in sensor networks using profiling techniques

Abstract: The heterogeneity and dynamics in terms of hardware and software configurations is steadily increasing in sensor networks. Therefore, software management is becoming one of the most prominent challenges in this domain. We developed a profilebased software management scheme that consists of a dynamic profile-matching algorithm to identify current SW/HW configurations, an on-demand code generation module, and mechanisms for dynamic network-centric reprogramming of sensor nodes. In this demo, we will dynamic node… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is heavily used for network code upload [2] [19]. It can disseminate data with 100% reliability at nearly 90 bytes/second.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is heavily used for network code upload [2] [19]. It can disseminate data with 100% reliability at nearly 90 bytes/second.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most work on analyzing the software for sensornets has been focused on verifying or understanding the network communication (e.g., [2,4]), or analyzing and predicting power consumption and duty cycles (e.g., [12,14]). There is just beginning some work in tools for assertion checking and correctness checking [1,10].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the system that we developed in our lab [26], code fragments for TinyOS programs are written in nesC. Specific profiles as discussed previously are connected to these fragments in order to describe functionality and utilization.…”
Section: Profile-matching For Code Generationmentioning
confidence: 99%