2004
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-25939-8_9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On Designing Dependable Services with Diverse Off-the-Shelf SQL Servers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We have reported recently results of studies on dependability and performance of database servers [34], [35], [36], [37]. The focus of these earlier studies was in measuring the amount of "diversity", in both correctness and response time, which exists between different servers, i.e.…”
Section: Numerical Examples: a Study With Off-the-shelf Database Serversmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have reported recently results of studies on dependability and performance of database servers [34], [35], [36], [37]. The focus of these earlier studies was in measuring the amount of "diversity", in both correctness and response time, which exists between different servers, i.e.…”
Section: Numerical Examples: a Study With Off-the-shelf Database Serversmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have described elsewhere [9], [2] in more detail the FT-node architecture. Here we will only elaborate on the parts relevant to the discussion of rephrasing.…”
Section: General Schemementioning
confidence: 99%
“…the next transaction. Therefore the diverse setups here are always slower (other configurations are possible and we have discussed some of these in [9]). Figure 2 illustrates the sequence of executions within a transaction for the different non-diverse setups.…”
Section: Performance Implications Of Rephrasingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Various studies in complex systems have shown that crash failures constitute a minority of failures [2,3], while trends in hardware increase the probability of transient hardware errors such as bit flips [4][5][6]. Worse yet, most replication protocols deployed in cloud centers provide weak consistency guarantees, meaning that they introduce inconsistencies even if there are no faults [7,8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%