Past research has shown that the relationship between cue and judgment often depends on the level of other cues (configural relationship). It is not clear, however, if this relationship is environmentally appropriate, To examine this issue, I compare configural models of the judgment with configural models of the criterion associated with this judgment, Twodatabases are analyzed. In one, the cues are the parents' educational level, the judgment is the educational expectations of the child, and the criterion is the actual educational achievement. In the other, the cues are the MMPI scores of psychiatric patients, the judgment is the clinical psychologists' estimation of the degree of pathology, and the criterion is the actual pathology. The analysis of both databases revealed that configurality characterizes the judgment but not the criterion.The term configurality in judgment refers to a cuejudgment relationship in which the impact of a cue on the judgment depends on the level of other cues. Many studies have found configurality in judgment, primarily in two areas: subjective utility and social judgment. Thus, in integrating the values of possible outcomes of a lottery, the subjective weight of each outcome often depends on the values of the other outcomes (e.g., Luce & Fishburn, 1990;Mellers, Chang, Birnbaum, & Ordonez, 1992;Tversky & Kahneman, 1992); and in integrating the values of various attributes of an object, the weight of each attribute depends on the values ofthe other attributes (e.g., Birnbaum & Stegner, 1979;Skowronski & Carlston, 1989).The term configurality in the criterion refers to a cuecriterion relationship in which the impact of a cue on the criterion depends on the level of other cues. While many studies have examined configurality in judgment, only a handful have examined configurality in criteria, and none of them support the notion that important real-life criteria are configural (e.g., Dawes & Corrigan, 1974;Goldberg, 1965).The difference between previous studies concerning configurality in judgment and previous studies concerning configurality in the criterion suggests that configurality may be a characteristic of the judgment but not of the criterion. However, none of these previous studies asked whether configurality in judgment is environmentally appropriate. To answer this question, one needs to examine simultaneously whether configurality describes the relationships between cues and judgment and the relationships between cues and the criterion associated with the judgment. Thus, the major purpose ofthis paper is to compare configural aspects ofjudgments (e.g.,judg-The author would like to thank Yaacov Schul and Avi Kluger for many helpful discussions. Correspondence should be addressed to Y. Ganzach, Faculty of Management, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel, 69978 (e-mail: yoavgn@post.tau.ac.il). ment of behavior) with configural aspects of the criteria associated with them (e.g., actual behavior).In the studies reported below, I examine examples that represent the most simple c...