Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences
DOI: 10.1109/hicss.2005.464
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On Development and Evaluation of Prototype Mobile Decision Support for Hospital Triage

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, iTriage [8] considers only 8 inputs for modeling a patient's condition while FMTS is more comprehensive and includes 49 reasons for arriving at an emergency center and 35 input linguistic variables for modeling symptoms related to each reason.…”
Section: Summary and Future Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For instance, iTriage [8] considers only 8 inputs for modeling a patient's condition while FMTS is more comprehensive and includes 49 reasons for arriving at an emergency center and 35 input linguistic variables for modeling symptoms related to each reason.…”
Section: Summary and Future Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…iTriage [8] is an expert system that implements the Australian Triage Standard. iTriage benefits from an advanced user infterface and produces robust decisions for urgent scenarios.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be done within a very short time approximately two to three minutes (San Pedro et al 2004) to sort the patients into the most appropriate assessment and treatment area. It is a process to categorize the casualties, based on their need for medical attention (Wilk et al 2005; Sadeghi et al 2006; Michalowski et al 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are many well-known advantages to use computerized tools and expert systems, such as reduction of missing data, better collection of data, no omission of questions, no data transcription and broader coverage of diagnoses. It is envisaged that by providing decision support tools to assist the triage officer in making correct and timely triage decisions that are consistent with standard triage scales can contribute to the improvement in the quality of life for patients and also reduce costs occurring from mistreatment (San Pedro et al 2004). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One project in Australia, offering prototype mobile decision-support for hospital triage, uses linguistic terms such as immediately or imminently life-threatening, potentially life-threatening or lifeserious as well as physiological attributes including mild or moderate, pink or pale to help guide a clinician's decisions when a patient presents as an ambiguous triage case [10]. Another uses fuzzy logic and decision trees to make classification of a patient's urgency level in the shortest possible time with minimum error [9].…”
Section: Fuzzy Futurementioning
confidence: 99%