1984
DOI: 10.1016/0045-7825(84)90022-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On different finite element methods for approximating the gradient of the solution to the helmholtz equation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2002
2002

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Chang [10], Chen [11], Fix, Gunzburger and Nicolaides [15], Haslinger and Neittaanmäki [19], Neittaanmäki and Saranen [25], Jespersen [20]. The results in these papers are discussed in detail in Pehlivanov and Carey [28], see also Carey et al [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Chang [10], Chen [11], Fix, Gunzburger and Nicolaides [15], Haslinger and Neittaanmäki [19], Neittaanmäki and Saranen [25], Jespersen [20]. The results in these papers are discussed in detail in Pehlivanov and Carey [28], see also Carey et al [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Moreover, the L 2 -and H 1 -error estimates do not require the finite element mesh to be quasi-uniform. Related studies on least squares mixed methods for elliptic equations can be found in [4,6,11,12,13,16] and references therein.…”
Section: Introduction Consider the Initial Boundary Value Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies based on first-order system formulations of the Helmholtz equation include [16], [18], [21], and [23]. The approach described in [16] does not include a curl term in the functional, so its discretizations are somewhat restrictive and its standard multigrid methods could not perform well with large wavenumbers, as expected.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The approach described in [16] does not include a curl term in the functional, so its discretizations are somewhat restrictive and its standard multigrid methods could not perform well with large wavenumbers, as expected. The functional in [18] incorporates a curl expression but not in a way that achieves uniformity in the discretization (or the multigrid solver, had they analyzed it). In fact, except for [21] and [23] which is the basis of the work presented in the present paper, none of the methods cited above were shown to achieve optimal discretization accuracy and multigrid convergence.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%