2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2020.04.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On-DNA hit validation methodologies for ligands identified from DNA-encoded chemical libraries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The compounds displayed a weak interaction with streptavidin, with dissociation constants Kd = 37 ± 2 and 42 ± 3 × 10 −6 m , respectively, which were measured by a small molecule ELISA procedure, recently described by our group. [ 17 ] Selections were also performed against human carbonic anhydrase IX, a tumor‐associated antigen and a marker of hypoxia. [ 18 ] As expected, aromatic sulfonamides derivatives were found to be preferentially enriched (with enrichment factors (EF) up to 969‐fold), as revealed by the lines at coordinates A94, A250, and B575 of the fingerprints in 3D display mode (Figure 2c).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The compounds displayed a weak interaction with streptavidin, with dissociation constants Kd = 37 ± 2 and 42 ± 3 × 10 −6 m , respectively, which were measured by a small molecule ELISA procedure, recently described by our group. [ 17 ] Selections were also performed against human carbonic anhydrase IX, a tumor‐associated antigen and a marker of hypoxia. [ 18 ] As expected, aromatic sulfonamides derivatives were found to be preferentially enriched (with enrichment factors (EF) up to 969‐fold), as revealed by the lines at coordinates A94, A250, and B575 of the fingerprints in 3D display mode (Figure 2c).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Error bars on the curve indicate standard deviation of the three measurements. The Kd values ± standard error for compound [16][17][18][19] are given next to the chemical structures.…”
Section: Supporting Informationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is also recognized that byproduct hits could contribute to the perceived false-positive results arising from these approaches. Several studies also described assessment methods for DNA–conjugate using ELISA and SPR, which are considered a more straightforward approach for validating DEL-derived hits, but cannot differentiate different components from the DNA–conjugate. Deciphering the complication of combinatorial synthesis has been a long-standing challenge of data deconvolution in the DEL selection process.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 32 For CAII selections, since monovalent SABA has an 0.6 μM affinity for CAII, this means that avidity was greatly helping to retrieve the SABA moiety. 50 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%