2015
DOI: 10.1134/s0965542515030069
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On efficient randomized algorithms for finding the PageRank vector

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also we want to point that the algorithm for solving equation (3.2) was chosen consciously from a set of modern methods for computing PageRank. We used review [5] of such methods. Since for our problem we need to estimate the error which is introduced to the function f (ϕ) value by approximate solution of the ranking problem (3.2), we considered only three methods: Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC), Spillman's and Nemirovski-Nesterov's (NN).…”
Section: Algorithm 2 Methods For Model Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Also we want to point that the algorithm for solving equation (3.2) was chosen consciously from a set of modern methods for computing PageRank. We used review [5] of such methods. Since for our problem we need to estimate the error which is introduced to the function f (ϕ) value by approximate solution of the ranking problem (3.2), we considered only three methods: Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC), Spillman's and Nemirovski-Nesterov's (NN).…”
Section: Algorithm 2 Methods For Model Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the lower level, we use the linearly convergent method from [17] to calculate an approximation to the stationary distribution of the Markov process. We show in Section 5 that this method has the best among others [5] complexity bound for the two-level method as a whole. However, it is not enough to calculate the stationary distribution itself, since we need also to optimize the parameters of the random walk with respect to an objective function, which is based on the stationary distribution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence we need some numerical scheme which allows to calculate approximation for π q (ϕ) and dπq(ϕ) dϕ T for every q ∈ Q with a given accuracy. Motivated by the last requirement we have analysed state-of-the-art methods for finding the solution of Equation 3.2 in huge dimension summarized in the review Gasnikov and Dmitriev (2015) and power method, used in Page et al (1999); Backstrom and Leskovec (2011);Zhukovskii et al (2014). Only four methods allow to make the difference π q (ϕ) − πq , where πq is the approximation, small for some norm • which is crucial to estimate the error in the approximation of the function f (ϕ) value.…”
Section: Numerical Calculation Of the Value And The Gradient Of F (ϕ)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the lower level of these methods, we use the linearly convergent method from Nes-terov and Nemirovski (2015) to calculate an approximation to the stationary distribution of Markov random walk. We analyze other methods from Gasnikov and Dmitriev (2015) and show that the chosen method is the most suitable since it allows to approximate the value of the loss function with any given accuracy and has lowest complexity estimation among others.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The problem becomes especially challenging in high dimensions since direct computations become unreliable due to non-linear time and memory efforts. Many studies have been devoted to the approximation of the PageRank vector based on random walks analysis and Markov Chain Monte Carlo methods [2,13,19,20,35,37]. Those methods are very attractive, both theoretically and practically, unless the spectral gap, i.e., the difference between the two largest eigenvalues of the transition matrix, is sufficiently large.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%