2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2019.103422
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On enhancing the mechanical behavior of ultra-high performance concrete through multi-scale fiber reinforcement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Workability: the results indicated a similar reduction on the optimal concrete matrix with PET recycled fibres and those with steel elements. Recycled PET fibre reinforced concrete 10-110 had lower workability (19%) with respect to control samples, while the Ragalwar et al [50] and Zemir et al [51] indicated a decrease from 9% to 15% of SFRC with 1% of steel fibres; this percentage is equivalent to the fibre dose used in this samples 10-110.…”
Section: Comparative Performance Of Optimal R/pet-frcmentioning
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Workability: the results indicated a similar reduction on the optimal concrete matrix with PET recycled fibres and those with steel elements. Recycled PET fibre reinforced concrete 10-110 had lower workability (19%) with respect to control samples, while the Ragalwar et al [50] and Zemir et al [51] indicated a decrease from 9% to 15% of SFRC with 1% of steel fibres; this percentage is equivalent to the fibre dose used in this samples 10-110.…”
Section: Comparative Performance Of Optimal R/pet-frcmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Ultimate compressive strength: similar to SFRC, the effect of the optimal recycled PET fibres into concrete is negligible. Vairagade and Kene [52], and Ragalwar et al [50] reported an augment of 6% to 10% in the response of SFRC samples with a fibre dose of 0.5 to 1%, referenced to control samples. Moreover, the optimal PET recycled fibre reinforced concrete was registered a reduction of 9%.…”
Section: Comparative Performance Of Optimal R/pet-frcmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…SDT such as pull out test, pull off test, computer tomography,chloride test etc 1,2 . is popular techniques to examine bond strength of steel fibers, 3 study interface between steel fiber and cementitious matrix, 4 characterize internal microstructure, 5 and evalaute behavior of bridge connections 6 . NDT based on vibration methods, imaging techniques, and nonlinear ultrasonic testing has been successfully applied to monitor deep foundation piles, 7 diagnose nonlinear effects in aircraft engines, 8 understand the behavior of transmission line conductors in field conditions by evaluating natural frequencies, 9 detect damage in fiber‐reinforced polymer‐bonded structures, 10 and describe modulated sidebands in metallic and carbon fiber‐reinforced polymer specimens 11 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The future of the industry involves recycling, and CSWFs, commonly made of low-carbon steel, can be used in the form of rolls or pads in brake pad linings (as a thermal shield); in automobile exhaust pipes (as an acoustic shield); in metal separation, water, and air filtration; and in cleaning. The cost of CSWFs is ~30–50% of the cost of steel fibers and they can be produced from recycled metal scraps [ 10 ]. The presence of steel fibers in high-strength cementitious composites and conventional concrete prevents crack formation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%