2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.physd.2008.11.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On ergodic and mixing properties of the triangle map

Abstract: In this paper we study in detail, both analytically and numerically, the dynamical properties of the triangle map, a piecewise parabolic automorphism of the two-dimensional torus, for different values of the two independent parameters defining the map. The dynamics is studied numerically by means of two different symbolic encoding schemes, both relying on the fact that it maps polygons to polygons: in the first scheme we consider dynamically generated partitions made out of suitable sets of disjoint polygons, … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
23
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1 we show time evolving phase space densities ρ −t for all four maps at t = 3, 5, 7, all starting from the same simple initial density ρ 0 (x, y) = (2 + cos x + cos y)(2π √ 5). Note that the three maps PC, SM and TM exhibit dynamical mixing behavior, although for TM the mixing mechanism is qualitatively different [10]. Only the orbits of the first two maps (PC and SM) have positive Kolmogorov complexity, with estimated Lyapunov exponents (being equal to Kolmogorov-Sinai entropies) λ PC max = 0.9496, λ SM max = 0.8206, and only PC exhibits exponential decay of correlations, d 2 zρ 0 (z)ρ t (z) − 1 ∼ exp(−ξt), with ξ PC = 1.17, while for SM and TM correlations decay as power laws.…”
Section: Numerical Examplesmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…1 we show time evolving phase space densities ρ −t for all four maps at t = 3, 5, 7, all starting from the same simple initial density ρ 0 (x, y) = (2 + cos x + cos y)(2π √ 5). Note that the three maps PC, SM and TM exhibit dynamical mixing behavior, although for TM the mixing mechanism is qualitatively different [10]. Only the orbits of the first two maps (PC and SM) have positive Kolmogorov complexity, with estimated Lyapunov exponents (being equal to Kolmogorov-Sinai entropies) λ PC max = 0.9496, λ SM max = 0.8206, and only PC exhibits exponential decay of correlations, d 2 zρ 0 (z)ρ t (z) − 1 ∼ exp(−ξt), with ξ PC = 1.17, while for SM and TM correlations decay as power laws.…”
Section: Numerical Examplesmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The singularities of F −1 α,β are F α,β (x m ) and F α,β (x m ). We shall use equations (6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11). For all α, β we have…”
Section: Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In such a case, the expression block entropy is commonly used in the literature. 10 Cases (i) and (ii) can be unified through the form W eff (N )…”
Section: N Binary Subsystemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We shall dedicate the present subsection to weakly chaotic twodimensional systems, namely the Casati-Prosen map (or triangle map) [8][9][10] and the Moore map [134][135][136], the former as focused on in [358], the latter as focused on in [138].…”
Section: Weakly Chaotic Two-dimensional Conservative Mapsmentioning
confidence: 99%