2011 IEEE GLOBECOM Workshops (GC Wkshps) 2011
DOI: 10.1109/glocomw.2011.6162468
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On ergodic capacity of cooperative non-regenerative relay networks in Rice fading environments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
24
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, our MGF expression may be exploited for efficient evaluation of ASER and/or average packet error rate (APER) with discrete-rate adaptive modulation and/or computation of the average detection probability of relay-assisted energy detector over generalized fading channel. Numerical results indicate that our MGF expression is much closer to the exact MGF compared to the widely used upper and lower bounds for the MGF of half harmonic mean SNR (e.g., [10]- [13]) despite its simplicity and generality. While our unified MGF formula is slightly less accurate compared to the MGF of the half-harmonic mean SNR (only available for specific fading scenarios) in [5]- [8] and [16], it is still very close to the exact MGF expression derived in [14] and [18] (also available for only specific fading environments) while ensuring numerically stable and low computational cost.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 60%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In addition, our MGF expression may be exploited for efficient evaluation of ASER and/or average packet error rate (APER) with discrete-rate adaptive modulation and/or computation of the average detection probability of relay-assisted energy detector over generalized fading channel. Numerical results indicate that our MGF expression is much closer to the exact MGF compared to the widely used upper and lower bounds for the MGF of half harmonic mean SNR (e.g., [10]- [13]) despite its simplicity and generality. While our unified MGF formula is slightly less accurate compared to the MGF of the half-harmonic mean SNR (only available for specific fading scenarios) in [5]- [8] and [16], it is still very close to the exact MGF expression derived in [14] and [18] (also available for only specific fading environments) while ensuring numerically stable and low computational cost.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…have also been developed to minimize the complexity of the problem in Nakagami-m [11], [12] and Rice channels with i.n.d diversity paths [13]. These expressions are summarized in (10) and (11), respectively.…”
Section: Nakagami-m Fadingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations