2015
DOI: 10.1007/s13370-015-0318-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On essentially finitely indecomposable $$ QTAG $$ Q T A G -modules

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

3
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We start by defining the following: In [3,6,9], respectively, HT -modules were defined with the aid of small homomorphisms and large submodules. Here we study these modules in the light of quasi-large submodules.…”
Section: Quasi-large Submodulesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We start by defining the following: In [3,6,9], respectively, HT -modules were defined with the aid of small homomorphisms and large submodules. Here we study these modules in the light of quasi-large submodules.…”
Section: Quasi-large Submodulesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [3] it was seen that essentially finitely indecomposable modules and HTmodules are equivalent properties. We prove here a weaker form of this conjecture.…”
Section: Definition 32mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a submodule N ⊆ M , the valuation of N induced by height in M is defined by v(x) = H M (x), the height of x in M , for all x ∈ N and N = K ⊕L is a valuated direct sum if v(k + ) = min{v(k), v( )} for all k ∈ K and ∈ L [2].…”
Section: Introduction Notation and Other Conventionsmentioning
confidence: 99%