1990
DOI: 10.1007/bf01000454
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On evaluating mediators

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a list of components against which mediators should be evaluated, one author notes that the mediator should be prepared, empathic, problem-solving, have persuasion and presentation skills, be able to minimize distractions, manage the interaction and have a substantive knowledge of the subject area (Honeyman 1990). These areas seem to be reflected to varying degrees throughout the literature.…”
Section: What Are the Important Mediator Characteristics Needed For Tmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a list of components against which mediators should be evaluated, one author notes that the mediator should be prepared, empathic, problem-solving, have persuasion and presentation skills, be able to minimize distractions, manage the interaction and have a substantive knowledge of the subject area (Honeyman 1990). These areas seem to be reflected to varying degrees throughout the literature.…”
Section: What Are the Important Mediator Characteristics Needed For Tmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Honeyman has since developed a scale that can be used to measure the quality he calls "distraction." See Honeyman (1990).…”
Section: Concludingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been more than twenty years since mass practice of mediation became a possible, if not inevitable, result of court and administrative reforms in a number of domains, and more than fifteen years since the first reasonably comprehensive test for mediator skills was articulated (Honeyman 1988, 1990). In the years since performance‐based testing and other tools for gauging and improving mediators’ skills became available, there has been a significant effort toward distinguishing varying definitions of the skills involved so that programs with different purposes and means can tailor the resulting evaluation scales and their uses to their own needs and circumstances.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%