2021
DOI: 10.1017/fms.2020.57
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On exceptional Lie geometries

Abstract: Parapolar spaces are point-line geometries introduced as a geometric approach to (exceptional) algebraic groups. We characterize a wide class of Lie geometries as parapolar spaces satisfying a simple intersection property. In particular, many of the exceptional Lie incidence geometries occur. In an appendix, we extend our result to the locally disconnected case and discuss the locally disconnected case of some other well-known characterizations.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, one can then deduce that Ω has a residue which is (−1)lacunary, and these are listed in our current main result. Although it is not hard to predict the possibilities for Ω, it requires non-trivial arguments to actually prove this-this will be pursued in another paper, see [6]. The locally connected parapolar spaces we obtain are E 6,2 (K), E 7,1 (K), E 8,8 (K) (which are longroot geometries) and their relatives (more precisely: residues).…”
Section: Future Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Indeed, one can then deduce that Ω has a residue which is (−1)lacunary, and these are listed in our current main result. Although it is not hard to predict the possibilities for Ω, it requires non-trivial arguments to actually prove this-this will be pursued in another paper, see [6]. The locally connected parapolar spaces we obtain are E 6,2 (K), E 7,1 (K), E 8,8 (K) (which are longroot geometries) and their relatives (more precisely: residues).…”
Section: Future Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…In general, sheaf theory is used to recognize certain parapolar spaces from their common point residues. In [6] we have proved some local recognition theorems, and we will use those and one more, see Lemma 4.6. The proof of the latter resembles that of Lemma 5.1 of [6], but since there are some essential differences, we include it in full.…”
Section: Strategy Of the Proofmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As for the second statement, we assume l < m (or, equivalently, 2d − 1 < n) and show that Ω is an admissible homomorphic image of a Grassmannian of a building. The proof roughly follows the strategy of the proof of Lemma 5.1 of [6]. It contains Lemma 5.2 of [6] (the proof of which was left to the reader) as a special case.…”
Section: Proof Of the Second Statement Of Conclusion (2) Of Theorem 41mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations