2020
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2012.15653
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On expansions for nonlinear systems, error estimates and convergence issues

Karine Beauchard,
Jérémy Le Borgne,
Frédéric Marbach

Abstract: Explicit formulas expressing the solution to non-autonomous differential equations are of great importance in many application domains such as control theory or numerical operator splitting. In particular, intrinsic formulas allowing to decouple time-dependent features from geometry-dependent features of the solution have been extensively studied.First, we give a didactic review of classical expansions for formal linear differential equations, including the celebrated Magnus expansion (associated with coordina… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Then (2.10) and (2.11) follow from the multivariate CBHD formula [1,Proposition 2.34]. Technically, this proposition is stated for finite products.…”
Section: Magnus Formula In Interaction Picturementioning
confidence: 95%
“…Then (2.10) and (2.11) follow from the multivariate CBHD formula [1,Proposition 2.34]. Technically, this proposition is stated for finite products.…”
Section: Magnus Formula In Interaction Picturementioning
confidence: 95%
“…This idea was introduced in [25] and later used in [9,16] for the Schrödinger equation. It was also used in finite dimension in [7] to study the quadratic behavior of differential systems or in [4] to give refined error estimates for various expansions of scalar-input affine control systems. By the Duhamel formula, the solution of the auxiliary system (63) with X(0) = ϕ 1 satisfies…”
Section: Quadratic and Cubic Behaviorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This follows the work of [9] where the authors already denied L ∞ -STLC in the case n = 1. Let us stress that such a result entails that, under (H lin ), (4) and (H quad ), the Schrödinger equation (1) is not H 3 -STLC.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our initial motivation, both for symmetric and asymmetric estimates, stems from convergence issues for series of Lie brackets of analytic vector fields (see e.g. the open problem raised in [2, Section 2.4.3] and the conditional result in [2,Section 4.4.3]). From an algebraic point of view, such estimates are linked with the intricacies of the Lie product in a Hall basis.…”
Section: Context and Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By item(2) of the second point of Proposition 5.1, the elements of the right-hand side are (evaluations of) distinct elements of B. Thus, [X 0 , ad n X1 (X 2 )] B = n k=0 n k = 2 n .…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%