“…Under the broad rubric of normative questions we usually group evaluative questions, assessing the positive or 5 However, empirical legal research is becoming more popular rapidly and is also the subject of methodological work. See, for example, the articles in Law and Method by Van den Bos & Hulst 2016, Dhami & Belton 2016, Melville & Hincks 2016, and Webley 2016 negative quality of law, and prescriptive questions, determining what should be done to improve the situation. 6 These often go together: a judgment that the law is faulty often leads up to a recommendation that the law needs to be improved to correct that fault, but this combination is not necessary.…”