2016
DOI: 10.5553/rem/.000014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On Experiments in Empirical Legal Research

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…16 Some empirical legal studies use field experiments, which combine causal control with a focus on real-world settings. 17 Empirical legal research can also use other kinds of methods, such as quantitative surveys, qualitative interviews (with individual participants or with focus groups), observations, and archival and case file analyses.…”
Section: From the Sociology Of Law To Empirical Legal Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…16 Some empirical legal studies use field experiments, which combine causal control with a focus on real-world settings. 17 Empirical legal research can also use other kinds of methods, such as quantitative surveys, qualitative interviews (with individual participants or with focus groups), observations, and archival and case file analyses.…”
Section: From the Sociology Of Law To Empirical Legal Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We know from French scholars that in the last thirty years, the law has become more devoted to governing the present; conversely, evaluation and experimentation techniques dominate the process of law-making (Chevallier, 1996;Crouzatier-Durand, 2003). The evaluative approach is characterized by introducing permanent correction and adjustment devices of legislation based on experience and observation (Mamontoff, 1998;Van den Bos & Hulst, 2016).…”
Section: The Influence Of 'Acceleration' On Law-making and The Effects For Legislationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under the broad rubric of normative questions we usually group evaluative questions, assessing the positive or 5 However, empirical legal research is becoming more popular rapidly and is also the subject of methodological work. See, for example, the articles in Law and Method by Van den Bos & Hulst 2016, Dhami & Belton 2016, Melville & Hincks 2016, and Webley 2016 negative quality of law, and prescriptive questions, determining what should be done to improve the situation. 6 These often go together: a judgment that the law is faulty often leads up to a recommendation that the law needs to be improved to correct that fault, but this combination is not necessary.…”
Section: From a Theoretical To A Normative Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%