2016
DOI: 10.1007/s40993-016-0057-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On explicit descent of marked curves and maps

Abstract: We revisit a statement of Birch that the field of moduli for a marked three-point ramified cover is a field of definition. Classical criteria due to Dèbes and Emsalem can be used to prove this statement in the presence of a smooth point, and in fact these results imply more generally that a marked curve descends to its field of moduli. We give a constructive version of their results, based on an algebraic version of the notion of branches of a morphism and allowing us to extend the aforementioned results to th… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To show that the Belyȋ map descends, it suffices[8, Cor. 5.4] (or[15, Theorem 3.4.8] with R = ∅) to show that the canonical model E 0 of E corresponding to the cocycle defined by the first two entries of (4.5.4) has a rational point. It does; in fact E 0 is isomorphic to E. Still, none of the points on E 0 that correspond to the ramification points of E are rational over Q(…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To show that the Belyȋ map descends, it suffices[8, Cor. 5.4] (or[15, Theorem 3.4.8] with R = ∅) to show that the canonical model E 0 of E corresponding to the cocycle defined by the first two entries of (4.5.4) has a rational point. It does; in fact E 0 is isomorphic to E. Still, none of the points on E 0 that correspond to the ramification points of E are rational over Q(…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2.4.8 and 2.4.9] Therefore, a natural question to ask is when can a dessin be defined over its field of moduli. Based on the work of Birch in [2] (see also [32]), a necessary, but not sufficient condition was given in [36] 1 .…”
Section: Invariant 34 (Cartography Group)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2.4.8 and 2.4.9] Therefore, a natural question to ask is when can a dessin be defined over its field of moduli. Based on the work of Birch in [2] (see also [32]), a necessary, but not sufficient condition was given in [36] 1 . Theorem 3.2 A dessin can be defined over its field of moduli if there exists a black vertex, or a white vertex, or a face center which is unique for its type and degree.…”
Section: Example 32mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Let be as in the introduction. If is singular, or higher-dimensional, it is not true that if , then is defined over its field of moduli (see [SV16, § 5] for singular examples in dimension ). Our main result (Theorem 5.4) is the following: let be a resolution of singularities of .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%