1971
DOI: 10.4064/cm-23-1-45-52
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On factorization of maps through τX

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1974
1974
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A subset A of X is far from the remainder (f.f.r.) [1] in X if for every free open ultrafilter *fr on X, there is open Ue^ such that c\ x U f] A = 0; a subset A of X is rigid in X [3] if for every filter base ^ on X such that Ann {<&ΘF\ Fe^~} = 0, there is open set U containing A and Fe ^ such that clU Π F = 0. The following facts are used in the sequel:…”
Section: And Called H-closed Relative To X An Open Filter Is a Filtementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A subset A of X is far from the remainder (f.f.r.) [1] in X if for every free open ultrafilter *fr on X, there is open Ue^ such that c\ x U f] A = 0; a subset A of X is rigid in X [3] if for every filter base ^ on X such that Ann {<&ΘF\ Fe^~} = 0, there is open set U containing A and Fe ^ such that clU Π F = 0. The following facts are used in the sequel:…”
Section: And Called H-closed Relative To X An Open Filter Is a Filtementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is shown in [7] that for a proper subset A of a space X , part (b) of the above result fails, while we shall show (see Example 4.15) that part (a) of the above result need not be true for a proper subset of a space X .…”
Section: Results 42 For the Whole Space X The Notions Of (A) S(θ )-mentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Several other authors independently have considered variations and generalizations of the idea of a perfect map: For example, [2] considers (in Hausdorff spaces) maps which preserve remainder in the Katëtov //-closed extension; [9] gives a categorical generalization and shows that in Tych, when y D^, the definition agrees with 2.1; [16] Proof. Let / : A -» S (E J^.…”
Section: Proposition Given S/ Let R and R' Denote The Functors For mentioning
confidence: 99%