Proceedings of the Twenty-Seventh International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence 2018
DOI: 10.24963/ijcai.2018/34
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On Fair Price Discrimination in Multi-Unit Markets

Abstract: Discriminatory pricing policies, even if at first glance can be perceived as unfair, are widespread. In fact, pricing differences for the same item among different national markets are common, or forms of discrimination based on the time of purchase, like in tickets' sales. In this work we propose a framework for capturing the setting of ``fair'' discriminatory pricing and study its application to multi-unit markets, in which many copies of the same item are on sale. Our model is able to incorporate the funda… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, some papers deal with multi-unit markets and consider a relaxed definition of market envyfreeness, in which, given a social graph, every agent (corresponding to a node) can only see the prices of items assigned to her neighbors (Flammini, Mauro, & Tonelli, 2018;Flammini et al, 2019). Similarly, several works in fair allocation of goods in absence of pricing assume an individual's view of the subjective well-being as based on a comparison with peers, that is restricting agent envy-freeness constraints to social neighbors (Abebe, Kleinberg, & Parkes, 2017;Chevaleyre, Endriss, & Maudet, 2007b).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, some papers deal with multi-unit markets and consider a relaxed definition of market envyfreeness, in which, given a social graph, every agent (corresponding to a node) can only see the prices of items assigned to her neighbors (Flammini, Mauro, & Tonelli, 2018;Flammini et al, 2019). Similarly, several works in fair allocation of goods in absence of pricing assume an individual's view of the subjective well-being as based on a comparison with peers, that is restricting agent envy-freeness constraints to social neighbors (Abebe, Kleinberg, & Parkes, 2017;Chevaleyre, Endriss, & Maudet, 2007b).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%