2020
DOI: 10.1029/2020jb019863
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On‐Fault Geological Fingerprint of Earthquake Rupture Direction

Abstract: How earthquake ruptures evolve and propagate are major outstanding questions in seismology. Our current understanding is limited to modern events captured by seismic networks, making it impossible to observe rupture propagation that occurred during earthquakes in the distant past. Here we propose a new method to discern the rupture propagation directions of past large earthquakes based on geological features preserved on fault slip planes. These features-called slickenlines-are striations formed during seismic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An analogous effect appears on a vertical strike‐slip fault with asymmetric topography. As shown in Figure 4d and in more detail in Figure S11 in the Supporting Information , we may identify the mountain side of the fault as the “footwall” and the flat side as the “hanging wall.” Even for vertical/symmetrical strike‐slip faults with no topography, strike‐slip motion produces a small component of dip‐slip stress ahead of rupture, and induces a small amount of dip‐slip motion behind the rupture front (e.g., Guatteri & Spudich, 1998a, 1998b; Kearse & Kaneko, 2020). This vertical component of stress and slip is analogous to that of a dip‐slip fault, it also induces clamping and unclamping to match the asymmetric free surface stress boundary condition.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An analogous effect appears on a vertical strike‐slip fault with asymmetric topography. As shown in Figure 4d and in more detail in Figure S11 in the Supporting Information , we may identify the mountain side of the fault as the “footwall” and the flat side as the “hanging wall.” Even for vertical/symmetrical strike‐slip faults with no topography, strike‐slip motion produces a small component of dip‐slip stress ahead of rupture, and induces a small amount of dip‐slip motion behind the rupture front (e.g., Guatteri & Spudich, 1998a, 1998b; Kearse & Kaneko, 2020). This vertical component of stress and slip is analogous to that of a dip‐slip fault, it also induces clamping and unclamping to match the asymmetric free surface stress boundary condition.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the concept appeared in early works (Anderson et al., 1996; Chester et al., 1993; Stirling et al., 1996; Wesnousky, 1988), the term was established more recently (Choy & Kirby, 2004; Manighetti et al., 2007) with attempts of quantification based on classifications of specific fault parameters (initiation age, total cumulative slip, length, and slip rate; Manighetti et al., 2007). Nowadays, the concept of fault structural maturity is extensively used, yet with no common definition nor metrics (e.g., Cheng & Barnhart, 2021; Dascher‐Cousineau et al., 2018; DuRoss et al., 2016; Huang, 2018; Kearse & Kaneko, 2020; Materna & Bürgmann, 2016; Perrin et al., 2021; Preuss et al., 2019; Thakur et al., 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The initial, deep rupture may be predominantly strikeslip, possibly along a steeper structure with subsequent up-dip failures on shallower preexisting planar discontinuities in the bedrock accommodating most of the reverse component. Slip variations during an earthquake rupture are recognized from recent and historical earthquakes (Kearse and Kaneko, 2020). Further research is needed to understand slip partioning associated with the Sparta earthquake.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%