2021
DOI: 10.1080/1472586x.2021.1887675
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On film as a method, gender and health politics: conversation with Sophie Harman

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The turn identified some important features of the aesthetic: its ability to challenge the logical integrity of other methods and expand as a consequence the type of discourses, subject matters and objects of enquiry; its ability to show the particularity of claims advanced and to show the power relations at the heart of our descriptive or analytical statements, but also its insistence on the fact that every object of study is encountered via a mediation and not in-itself. As Harman (2019) puts it, ‘film depicts the rhythms and temporality of the everyday and the hidden dimensions of politics that cannot be captured by the written word’ (15). Callahan (2020) broadens the scope considerably by working on the dyad visibility/visuality, where the former ‘deconstructs’, whilst the latter ‘creates’ (20).…”
Section: The Turn and Its Limitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The turn identified some important features of the aesthetic: its ability to challenge the logical integrity of other methods and expand as a consequence the type of discourses, subject matters and objects of enquiry; its ability to show the particularity of claims advanced and to show the power relations at the heart of our descriptive or analytical statements, but also its insistence on the fact that every object of study is encountered via a mediation and not in-itself. As Harman (2019) puts it, ‘film depicts the rhythms and temporality of the everyday and the hidden dimensions of politics that cannot be captured by the written word’ (15). Callahan (2020) broadens the scope considerably by working on the dyad visibility/visuality, where the former ‘deconstructs’, whilst the latter ‘creates’ (20).…”
Section: The Turn and Its Limitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the significant changes in the understanding of the causes of famine, Campbell 29 finds that the photographic portrayal of famine has remained rather static as stereotypical portraits of famine are continued to be produced and, in the case of HIV/ AIDS, shows how images of abject individuals support a reduction of the pandemic as a general construct to a specific embodiment. 30 Working on and especially with women with HIV/AIDS in Tanzania, Harman 31 explores film as a visual method to challenge these narratives.…”
Section: (Not) Seeing the Health-security Nexusmentioning
confidence: 99%