2018
DOI: 10.1177/1687814018784840
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On finite-time consensus objectives in time-varying interconnected discrete linear dynamic systems under internal and external delays

Abstract: This article formulates the properties of achievable consensus of linear interconnected discrete systems with multiple internal and external point delays. The formulation is stated in an algebraic generic context as the ability of achievement of (a non-necessarily zero) finite-time common error between the various subsystems. The consensus signals are generically defined so that they can be, in general, distinct of the output or state components. However, the consensus signals of all the interconnected subsyst… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In comparison with the output-feedback-based COR problem in Reference [4], where the authors design two control laws, which correspond to two kinds of follower agents in the MAS, the first kind are called informed agents, i.e., measurement output y mi contains exogenous signal v, then v is detectable from y mi . The second kind are called uninformed agents, where measurement output y mi does not contain exogenous signal v. As Section 2 just considers that all the follower agents are uninformed, i.e., a special case of literature [2], a single control law (21) will realise COR if no fault occurs, where c > 0, and the designed K 1i and L i make A i + B i K 1i and A i + L i C mi Hurwitz stable, which is not contradicted with the existence conditions of observers (29), i.e., control law (21) and observers (29) could run simultaneously.…”
Section: Simulation Examplementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In comparison with the output-feedback-based COR problem in Reference [4], where the authors design two control laws, which correspond to two kinds of follower agents in the MAS, the first kind are called informed agents, i.e., measurement output y mi contains exogenous signal v, then v is detectable from y mi . The second kind are called uninformed agents, where measurement output y mi does not contain exogenous signal v. As Section 2 just considers that all the follower agents are uninformed, i.e., a special case of literature [2], a single control law (21) will realise COR if no fault occurs, where c > 0, and the designed K 1i and L i make A i + B i K 1i and A i + L i C mi Hurwitz stable, which is not contradicted with the existence conditions of observers (29), i.e., control law (21) and observers (29) could run simultaneously.…”
Section: Simulation Examplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, a large amount of literature on cooperative control of multi-agent systems (MAS) has emerged, which investigate this problem from different aspects, such as event-triggered and finite-time cooperative control [1,2]. Besides homogeneous MAS, research on heterogeneous MAS is also significant.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%