2014
DOI: 10.1111/iere.12045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On Fiscal Multipliers: Estimates From a Medium Scale Dsge Model

Abstract: This article contributes to the debate on fiscal multipliers, in the context of an estimated dynamic stochastic general equilibrium model, featuring a rich fiscal policy block and a transmission mechanism for government spending shocks. I find the multiplier for government spending to be 1.07, which is largest on impact. The multipliers for labor and capital tax on impact are 0.13 and 0.34, respectively. The effects of tax cuts take time to build and exceed stimulative effects of spending by 12–20 quarters. I … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
97
2
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 166 publications
(105 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
3
97
2
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Steady-state government expenditure is calibrated to ensure that its share in output, g=y, is 20%. The labor income tax rate, n , is set to 0.23, and the capital income tax rate, k , is set to 0.41, following Zubairy (2014). The (quarterly) property tax rate, p , is set to 0.0035, which implies an annual property tax rate of 1.4%, based on the 50-State Property Tax Comparison Study conducted by the Minnesota Taxpayers Association (2011).…”
Section: Steady-state Targets and Other Restrictions Imposed On The Ementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Steady-state government expenditure is calibrated to ensure that its share in output, g=y, is 20%. The labor income tax rate, n , is set to 0.23, and the capital income tax rate, k , is set to 0.41, following Zubairy (2014). The (quarterly) property tax rate, p , is set to 0.0035, which implies an annual property tax rate of 1.4%, based on the 50-State Property Tax Comparison Study conducted by the Minnesota Taxpayers Association (2011).…”
Section: Steady-state Targets and Other Restrictions Imposed On The Ementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach has significant advantages over others including full information approach which fits the model to all variations and data and not only to the impact of policy (Zubairy, 2009). In an earlier study, arguing in favour of Bayesian estimation, Milani and Poirier (2007) stated that the micro-foundation and the Bayesian approach have made the DSGE model to stand apart from the models built on dogmatic prior for structural parameters.…”
Section: Bayesian Estimation and Bayes' Theoremmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Angelopoulos, Philippopoulos, and Vassilatos (2009) maintain the representative-agent hypothesis and incorporate an uncoordinated redistributive struggle for transfers into an otherwise standard DSGE model. Zubairy (2014) investigates the consequences of temporary public transfer shocks in an estimated representative-agent DSGE model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%