2015
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-21362-0_9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On Flattenability of Graphs

Abstract: We consider a generalization of the concept of d-flattenability of graphs -introduced for the l2 norm by Belk and Connelly -to general lp norms, with integer P , 1 ≤ p < ∞, though many of our results work for l∞ as well. The following results are shown for graphs G, using notions of genericity, rigidity, and generic d-dimensional rigidity matroid introduced by Kitson for frameworks in general lp norms, as well as the cones of vectors of pairwise l p p distances of a finite point configuration in d-dimensional,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The concept is best explained using key theorems of the first author in [59,63] discussed in Section 4.…”
Section: Symmetries Within An Active Constraint Region Via Cayley Conmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The concept is best explained using key theorems of the first author in [59,63] discussed in Section 4.…”
Section: Symmetries Within An Active Constraint Region Via Cayley Conmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another advantage is that the method is completely unaffected when δ are intervals rather than exact values [59]. A different characterization of inherent Cayley convexity for a graph G on a set F of non-edges as in the above section has been proven also for higher dimensions d [59,64], showing equivalence to a minor closed property of d-flattenability introduced in [65] and also for other, non-Euclidean distances (norms) in [63]. Any realization of H in a normed space can be flattened into d-dimensional normed space (in the same norm) maintaining the same edge distances.…”
Section: Theorem 8 [59]mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another point of view is to require only a subset of distances to be preserved, which is the perspective we take in this paper. Our methods are mostly graph theoretical, although similar problems have been studied using techniques from rigidity theory [14,20,21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Let W 4 denote the wheel on 5 vertices and K 4 + e K 4 be the graph obtained by gluing two copies of K 4 along an edge e and then deleting e, see Figure 1. Using techniques from rigidity matroids, Sitharam and Willoughby [17] determined f ∞ (G) for all graphs G with at most 5 vertices, except for W 4 . They conjectured that W 4 is an excluded minor for f ∞ (G) 2, and that W 4 is the only excluded minor for f ∞ (G) 2.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%