2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jalgebra.2010.05.035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On Fox and augmentation quotients of semidirect products

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…is proved to be a direct summand of Q 3 (G, H) but is not computed in [16]; we here fill this gap noting that X = Q H 3 (H, H) where the N-series H = (H (n) ) n≥1 is given by H (n+1) = [H (n) , G], see also [9]. Indeed, the structure of Q …”
Section: The Third Fox Quotientmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…is proved to be a direct summand of Q 3 (G, H) but is not computed in [16]; we here fill this gap noting that X = Q H 3 (H, H) where the N-series H = (H (n) ) n≥1 is given by H (n+1) = [H (n) , G], see also [9]. Indeed, the structure of Q …”
Section: The Third Fox Quotientmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…This map is clearly surjective but rarely globally injective; for instance, θ γ is injective if G has torsionfree lower central quotients G n /G n+1 or is cyclic, but θ γ is non injective for all non cyclic finite abelian groups [1]. At least, the kernel of θ G is torsion as θ G ⊗ Q is an isomorphism; this was proved by Quillen for G = γ and follows from work of Hartley [11] in the general case, see also [9]. Moreover, Ker(θ G ) is trivial in degree 1 and 2 (by [2] for N = γ ) and is explicitely known in degree 3, see [4].…”
Section: Canonical Approximation Of Fox Quotientsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…(a) This follows from [Hart,Theorem 1.3]. In [Hart,Theorem 1.3], a discrete group G is considered, but an adaptation of this proof to the profinite case is straightforward.…”
Section: Hilbert-poincaré Seriesmentioning
confidence: 99%