“…An example is provided by the group G = <Xj, x2;x2 = x2 >, which actually has infinitely many T-systems [24], [6]. It should also be pointed out that, contrary to a conjecture of Magnus, not every one-relator group satisfies the assumptions of Theorem l(i) ( [4], [13], and §1.3 below).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The previous subsection shows that a determination of the Nielsen equivalence classes and T-systems of a group, particularly a one-relator group, is of considerable importance, and this problem has received the attention of several authors (see, for example, [4] - [6], [13], [16], [18], [19], [22] - [26] ). In this subsection a theorem is obtained which will be used in §1.3 below to show that certain two-generator onerelator groups with torsion have one Nielsen equivalence class.…”
ABSTRACT. This paper is concerned with obtaining information about the Nielsen equivalence classes and T-systems of certain two-generator HNN groups, and in particular of certain two-generator one-relator groups. The theorems pre- The paper is divided into three sections. The first section is fairly informal and contains all the main results. The second section is devoted to proving two reduction theorems used in § 1. The third section is given to establishing that various groups satisfy conditions enumerated in § 1. (These conditions ensure that one can determine the Nielsen equivalence classes of certain HNN extensions of the groups in question.) Each section is subdivided, and has a short introduction explaining its contents more fully.The standard reference for notation and background material used throughout this paper will be the book [12] by Magnus, Karrass and Solitar. Additional concepts and notation will be needed as follows. Let G be a group. If A is a sub-
“…An example is provided by the group G = <Xj, x2;x2 = x2 >, which actually has infinitely many T-systems [24], [6]. It should also be pointed out that, contrary to a conjecture of Magnus, not every one-relator group satisfies the assumptions of Theorem l(i) ( [4], [13], and §1.3 below).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The previous subsection shows that a determination of the Nielsen equivalence classes and T-systems of a group, particularly a one-relator group, is of considerable importance, and this problem has received the attention of several authors (see, for example, [4] - [6], [13], [16], [18], [19], [22] - [26] ). In this subsection a theorem is obtained which will be used in §1.3 below to show that certain two-generator onerelator groups with torsion have one Nielsen equivalence class.…”
ABSTRACT. This paper is concerned with obtaining information about the Nielsen equivalence classes and T-systems of certain two-generator HNN groups, and in particular of certain two-generator one-relator groups. The theorems pre- The paper is divided into three sections. The first section is fairly informal and contains all the main results. The second section is devoted to proving two reduction theorems used in § 1. The third section is given to establishing that various groups satisfy conditions enumerated in § 1. (These conditions ensure that one can determine the Nielsen equivalence classes of certain HNN extensions of the groups in question.) Each section is subdivided, and has a short introduction explaining its contents more fully.The standard reference for notation and background material used throughout this paper will be the book [12] by Magnus, Karrass and Solitar. Additional concepts and notation will be needed as follows. Let G be a group. If A is a sub-
“…Let k, I be integers different from 0, ± 1. It was shown in [2] that if r, s are integers satisfying (r, s) = (r, k) = (s, l)=l, then the group (xx, x2; x\=xl2) has presentation 11 == \X^, -^2» XiXqXi X% --1 , X-^XqXi X% ^= 1 , X-± X% ^-1/.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the study of these groups, the problem arises of determining for which values of/-and y the presentation If is (in the notation of [2]) a one relation presentation. The object of this note is to prove a result which has as a consequence the fact that, given k, I, r and s, it can be determined if the corresponding presentation II is a one relation presentation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From n we can obtain, by Theorem 3.5 of [1], a presentation Il1 = {b1,bi;V1=l,---,Vn = l) of G which is N-equivalent (in the notation of [2]) to n, and such that…”
For a family of special affine plane curves, it is shown that their embeddings in the affine plane are unique up to automorphisms of the affine plane. Examples are also given for which the embedding is not unique. We also discuss the Lin-Zaidenberg estimate of the number of singular points of an irreducible curve in terms of its rank. Formulas concerning the rank of the curve lead to an alternate simpler version of the proof of the Epimorphism Theorem.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.