1966
DOI: 10.1215/ijm/1256054991
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On full embeddings of categories of algebras

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
44
0
2

Year Published

1968
1968
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 105 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
44
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, Hedrlín and Pultr [35] showed in 1966 that every category of finite structures is "fully embeddable" in the category of finite graphs. (For a beautiful exposition, see [36].)…”
Section: Automorphism Group Vs Isomorphism Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, Hedrlín and Pultr [35] showed in 1966 that every category of finite structures is "fully embeddable" in the category of finite graphs. (For a beautiful exposition, see [36].)…”
Section: Automorphism Group Vs Isomorphism Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A quasivariety K is universal if every category of algebras of finite signature (or equivalently, as shown Pultr [92], Hedrlín and Pultr [60] and Vopěnka, Hedrlín, and Pultr [108], the category G of all directed graphs) is isomorphic to a full subcategory of K. If an embedding of G may be effected by a functor which assigns a finite algebraic system to each finite graph, then K is said to be finite-to-finite universal. Of particular interest for a universal quasivariety K is the fact that, for every monoid M , there exists a proper class of non-isomorphic algebraic systems belonging to K each of which has an endomorphism monoid isomorphic to M .…”
Section: Question 16 Is It True That If L(k) Satisfies No Nontrivialmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Let G a denote the full subcategory of non-trivial members of G where, for (G; E) in G a , if x ∈ G, (y, x) ∈ E for some y ∈ G. In Hedrlín and Pultr [6], it was shown that G a is finite-to-finite-universal. On the other hand, by Hedrlín and Pultr [5], there is a full and faithful functor F : G a −→ G u which we now specify.…”
Section: The Verification Of 11 and 12mentioning
confidence: 99%