2009
DOI: 10.1002/cem.1268
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On further application of r as a metric for validation of QSAR models

Abstract: Validation is a crucial aspect for quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) model development. External validation is considered, in general, as the most conclusive proof of predictive capacity of a QSAR model. In the absence of truly external data set, external validation is usually performed on test set compounds, which are members of the original data set but not used in model development exercise. In the case of small data sets, QSAR researchers experience problem in model development due to the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
43
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

4
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
1
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Initially, the concept leading to r 2 m was applied only to the test set prediction [42], but it can also be applied for the training set if one considers the correlation between observed and LOO-predicted values of the training set compounds [43,44]. More interestingly, this can be used for the whole set considering LOO-predicted values for the training set and SAR and QSAR in Environmental Research 155 predicted values of the test set compounds.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Initially, the concept leading to r 2 m was applied only to the test set prediction [42], but it can also be applied for the training set if one considers the correlation between observed and LOO-predicted values of the training set compounds [43,44]. More interestingly, this can be used for the whole set considering LOO-predicted values for the training set and SAR and QSAR in Environmental Research 155 predicted values of the test set compounds.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 Steps associated with the different QSAR techniques performed in the present study map the test set compounds, and the activity of the test molecules was estimated based on the degree of mapping and the calculated value of the external predictive parameter (R 2 pred ; with a threshold value of 0.5) [34]. Furthermore, to better determine the external predictive potential of the developed 3D pharmacophore model, the value of modified r 2 for the test set r 2 m test ð Þ h i was also calculated [35][36][37][38]. Another method employed to determine the essential structural features of the chromone derivatives include the CoMSIA technique [39].…”
Section: Different Methods Employed For the Development Of Qsar Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The slope of predicted versus experimental values of the data through the origin (K) should also lie between 0.85 and 1.15. Recently, a parameter named as 'R 2 m ' which can be calculated by Equation (10) is introduced by Mitra et al [45] for the validation of the model:…”
Section: Qsar Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%