2004
DOI: 10.1081/agb-120028802
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On Good Filtration Dimensions for Standardly Stratified Algebras

Abstract: Abstract. ∇-good filtration dimensions of modules and of algebras are introduced by Parker for quasi-hereditary algebras. These concepts are now generalized to the setting of standardly stratified algebras. Let A be a standardly stratified algebra. The ∇-good filtration dimension of A is proved to be the projective dimension of the characteristic module of A. Several characterizations of ∇-good filtration dimensions and ∆-good filtration dimensions are given for properly stratified algebras. Finally we give an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Then, as a consequence we get interesting results for the theory of stratifying systems. In particular we generalize some of the results obtained by B. Zhu and S. Caenepeel in [5] and also one of the results of V. Mazorchuk and S. Ovsienko in [14]. We also give some examples to illustrate the conditions of the main results.…”
Section: Applications To Stratifying Systemsmentioning
confidence: 64%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Then, as a consequence we get interesting results for the theory of stratifying systems. In particular we generalize some of the results obtained by B. Zhu and S. Caenepeel in [5] and also one of the results of V. Mazorchuk and S. Ovsienko in [14]. We also give some examples to illustrate the conditions of the main results.…”
Section: Applications To Stratifying Systemsmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…Parker introduced in [15] the notion of R Δ-good filtration dimension for quasihereditary algebras. Afterwards, B. Zhu and S. Caenepeel did the same in [5] for standardly stratified algebras. Since, as we have seen above, the notion of stratifying system generalizes the concept of standardly stratified algebra, it would be very interesting to extend such filtration dimension and to get one that makes sense in any algebra.…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Given a quasi-hereditary algebra, of central importance are the standard modules DðlÞ, the D-good module category FðDÞ (Deng and Zhu, 2001;Dlab and Ringel, 1992;Klucznik and Kö nig, 1999;Ringel, 1991;Zhu and Caenepeel, 2004), and in particular, the characteristic module (Ringel, 1991;Zhu and Caenepeel, 2004). For Z-graded or N-graded quasi-hereditary algebras, it was proved in Cline et al (1990) that the standard modules and the defining hereditary chain of a graded quasi-hereditary algebra are gradable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They appear in the work of Futorny, K6nig and Mazorchuk on a generalisation of the category O ( [7]). Analogously to quasi-hereditary algebras ( [13]), given a standardly stratified algebra (A, A), of central importance are the modules filtered by respectively standard modules, costandard modules, proper standard modules or proper costandard modules (the precise meaning will be given in Section 2) [1,2,12,14,15].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, in order to calculate the global dimension of the Schur algebra for GLi and GL 3 , Parker [10,11] introduced the notion of V-(or A-)good filtration dimension for a quasi-hereditary algebra. In [15] we generalise this notion to standardly stratified algebras, and observe that the V-good filtration dimension of standardly stratified algebras is the projective dimension of their characterisation module. By using this, we gave an upper bound of the finitistic dimensions for certain class of proper stratified algebras, whose characteristic tilting modules coincide with characteristic cotilting modules.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%