1989
DOI: 10.1090/s0002-9939-1989-0960648-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On graphs representing automorphisms of free groups

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are several alternative constructions of Gersten graphs in the literature. For our purposes, an easily constructed infinite version, introduced in [25], is the most suitable.…”
Section: Gersten Graphsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are several alternative constructions of Gersten graphs in the literature. For our purposes, an easily constructed infinite version, introduced in [25], is the most suitable.…”
Section: Gersten Graphsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proof (Krstić(1989), here streamlined). For each finite 1-containing subset W of F , we let XW and YW denote the vertex-sets of the 1-containing components of the forests X W and W Y respectively; also, we let XW and YW denote the vertex-sets of the tree-closures of W in the trees X F and F Y respectively, where the tree-closure of W in a tree is the inclusion-smallest subtree which includes W .…”
Section: Lemmamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gersten(1987) constructed a graph model for each F -automorphism, and Stallings(1983) pointed out a connection between Gersten's model and Whitehead's. Krstić(1989) used Cayley trees to simplify Gersten's construction. Hoare(1990) gave an explicit description of Whitehead's model in terms of Gersten's.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%