2009
DOI: 10.1017/s0021900200005519
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On Growth-Collapse Processes with Stationary Structure and Their Shot-Noise Counterparts

Abstract: In this paper we generalize existing results for the steady-state distribution of growthcollapse processes. We begin with a stationary setup with some relatively general growth process and observe that, under certain expected conditions, point-and time-stationary versions of the processes exist as well as a limiting distribution for these processes which is independent of initial conditions and necessarily has the marginal distribution of the stationary version. We then specialize to the cases where an indepen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As soon as the type of move is fixed (down or up), to decide where the process goes precisely, we must use the inverse of the corresponding distribution function (24) (with y ≤ x or y > x), conditioned on the type of move. Remark 14.…”
Section: The Embedded Chainmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As soon as the type of move is fixed (down or up), to decide where the process goes precisely, we must use the inverse of the corresponding distribution function (24) (with y ≤ x or y > x), conditioned on the type of move. Remark 14.…”
Section: The Embedded Chainmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Decay-surge models have been extensively studied in the literature; see among others Eliazar and Klafter [12] and Harrison and Resnick [19,20]. Most studies, however, concentrate on non-Markovian models such as shot-noise or Hawkes processes, where superpositions of overlapping decaying populations are considered; see Brémaud and Massoulié [5], Eliazar and Klafter [13,14], Huillet [23], Kella and Stadje [25], Kella [24], and Brockwell et al [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation