2022
DOI: 10.1121/10.0014175
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On H1–H2 as an acoustic measure of linguistic phonation type

Abstract: The measure H1–H2, the difference in amplitude between the first and second harmonics, is frequently used to distinguish phonation types and to characterize differences across voices and genders. While H1–H2 can differentiate voices and is used by listeners to perceive changes in voice quality, its relation to voice articulation is less straightforward. Its calculation also involves practical issues with error propagation. This paper highlights some developments in the use of H1–H2 and proposes a new measure t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, a more likely possibility could be that senior Shanghainese speakers rely more on other acoustic cues instead of plain VOT differences. These factors can be said to include tonal differences, phonation types, H1-H2, and so on [11]. In fact, this is exactly the case, as is stated in the introduction, and the deviance of the results from the hypothesis shows that these are unignorable factors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…However, a more likely possibility could be that senior Shanghainese speakers rely more on other acoustic cues instead of plain VOT differences. These factors can be said to include tonal differences, phonation types, H1-H2, and so on [11]. In fact, this is exactly the case, as is stated in the introduction, and the deviance of the results from the hypothesis shows that these are unignorable factors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…As a measure of amplitude or intensity of the voice signal, increasing RMS energy is therefore related to a louder percept 13 . Lastly, H1‐H2 is associated with a quality continuum from “breathy” to “modal” to “strained,” and a decreasing amplitude difference between the first and second harmonics indicates a less breathy voice 20 . The variables were sampled every 5 ms from a 1‐s portion of stable phonation of each audio sample using VoiceSauce 21 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13 Lastly, H1-H2 is associated with a quality continuum from "breathy" to "modal" to "strained," and a decreasing amplitude difference between the first and second harmonics indicates a less breathy voice. 20 The variables were sampled every 5 ms from a 1-s portion of stable phonation of each audio sample using VoiceSauce. 21 To validate our model, we additionally measured the resulting fundamental frequency and the subglottal pressure required for sustained phonation.…”
Section: Acoustic Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the subsequent analysis, we also include measures of the individual harmonic amplitudes, because these can also be associated with differences across phonation types; for example, Esposito (2012) found that H1* was better than H1* − H2* at distinguishing modal and creaky phonation types. Chai and Garellek (2022) describe a different way to normalize H1 measurements, but that is not included in our data set.…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%