2004
DOI: 10.1023/b:nala.0000005564.33961.e0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On Headed, Headless, and Light-Headed Relatives

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
39
0
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 110 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
39
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…According to this approach, rooted in Vergnaud (1974) and Kayne (1994), the head of the relative clause itself, rather than the operator, moves from the embedded sentence. Citko (2004) and Szucsich (2003) present the following versions of this analysis for Slavic languages: Wh-DP (which includes the relative pronoun as head D 0 and the relative clause head as its complement) moves from the position of the complement of the verb to Spec-CP, and then the NP further raises from Spec-CP to the position of the relative clause head, which is external to the CP (if the same analysis applies for Russian, it would have the form as in example (10), adapted to Russian from the Polish analysis in Citko, 2004). 7…”
Section: This-neutr Boy-nom-sg Who-acc-masc-sg Girl-nom Drawsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to this approach, rooted in Vergnaud (1974) and Kayne (1994), the head of the relative clause itself, rather than the operator, moves from the embedded sentence. Citko (2004) and Szucsich (2003) present the following versions of this analysis for Slavic languages: Wh-DP (which includes the relative pronoun as head D 0 and the relative clause head as its complement) moves from the position of the complement of the verb to Spec-CP, and then the NP further raises from Spec-CP to the position of the relative clause head, which is external to the CP (if the same analysis applies for Russian, it would have the form as in example (10), adapted to Russian from the Polish analysis in Citko, 2004). 7…”
Section: This-neutr Boy-nom-sg Who-acc-masc-sg Girl-nom Drawsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here is a brief account of their structural properties (which are quite distinct from those Grosu (2003) and Citko (2004) discuss).…”
Section: Free Relativesmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…The following is another example of the Japanese Quantificational HIRC. 5,6 Interestingly, (i) is essentially what Citko (2004) proposes for a Polish free relative (her term ''headless relative'') given in (ii) (see C's (2) and (42) as well as her fn. 16).…”
Section: Quantificational Hircsmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2 There are other uses of the pronoun to in Polish besides the copula use. It can also function as a proximate demonstrative pronoun (i), a relative clause light head in the sense of Citko (2004) (ii), a correlative pronoun (iii), and an eventive to in the sense of Progovac (1998) (iv-vi). What distinguishes the eventive to from other types is the fact that it is used to refer to events.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%