2015
DOI: 10.1007/s00209-015-1487-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On Hörmander’s solution of the $$\bar{\partial }$$ ∂ ¯ -equation. I

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We are going to prove the following statement. Hedenmalm, the latter proposed a short proof of a result, closely related to Theorem 4.1, see [8]. In fact, in [8], the solvability and weighted integral estimates for the∂-equation for functions, dual to (1.1), have been proved for a wide class of weights.…”
Section: The∂-equation For Functions In D Qmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We are going to prove the following statement. Hedenmalm, the latter proposed a short proof of a result, closely related to Theorem 4.1, see [8]. In fact, in [8], the solvability and weighted integral estimates for the∂-equation for functions, dual to (1.1), have been proved for a wide class of weights.…”
Section: The∂-equation For Functions In D Qmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Hedenmalm, the latter proposed a short proof of a result, closely related to Theorem 4.1, see [8]. In fact, in [8], the solvability and weighted integral estimates for the∂-equation for functions, dual to (1.1), have been proved for a wide class of weights. This result does not replace our Theorem 4.1, since we need here the solvability and estimates for the∂-equation in some special classes of distributions, not only functions.…”
Section: The∂-equation For Functions In D Qmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For the first order ∂ := ∂ 1 , the Cauchy-Riemann operator, we have the following slight extension of the simplest case of Hörmander's theorem in the complex plane ( [2] and [3]) (a = 0; see [4] for a related result). Note that ∆ = 4∂∂.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case n = 1, H. Hedenmalm [3] proved the following theorem Theorem 1.1 Let ω ∈ L 2 0,1 (C, e ϕ ) then there is u ∈ L 2 (C, c ϕ e ϕ ) such that∂u = ω, and u L 2 (C,cϕe ϕ ) ≤ C ω L 2 (C,e ϕ ) , provided that ω ⊥ H 0 (C, e −ϕ ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%