Readings in Fuzzy Sets for Intelligent Systems 1993
DOI: 10.1016/b978-1-4832-1450-4.50013-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ON IMPLICATION AND INDISTINGUISHABILITY IN THE SETTING OF FUZZY LOGIC**la fond remembrance of Xarier Domingo.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
29
0
9

Year Published

1996
1996
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
29
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…It is immediate to see that 0 is the only membership function which is strong-self-contradictory but F (E) is so large that whenever a strong negation N g is considered, it is possible to find weak-self-contradictory elements and (N g , x)-local self-contradictory membership functions. Such elements are easily identified by means of the following observation: (4) holds if and only if (x)-n g (the fixed point of N g ) and therefore (3) holds if and only if -n g , i.e., all functions below n g are weak-self-contradictory. What is worse is that, whenever sup + (x) " x3E,:1 then, there exist strong negations N g which make a weak-self-contradictory membership function.…”
Section: Selfcontradiction In Fuzzy Sets Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is immediate to see that 0 is the only membership function which is strong-self-contradictory but F (E) is so large that whenever a strong negation N g is considered, it is possible to find weak-self-contradictory elements and (N g , x)-local self-contradictory membership functions. Such elements are easily identified by means of the following observation: (4) holds if and only if (x)-n g (the fixed point of N g ) and therefore (3) holds if and only if -n g , i.e., all functions below n g are weak-self-contradictory. What is worse is that, whenever sup + (x) " x3E,:1 then, there exist strong negations N g which make a weak-self-contradictory membership function.…”
Section: Selfcontradiction In Fuzzy Sets Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The process of making the information uniform involves the comparison between fuzzy sets representing the semantics of the initial terms assessed in Si and the fuzzy sets of the linguistic terms of the BLTS. Comparisons are usually carried out by means of a measure of comparison, that depending on the framework, the measure of comparison can have different forms [13,14,25,37,38,47]. We focus on measures of comparison which evaluate the resemblance or likeness of two objects (fuzzy sets in our case).…”
Section: Making the Information Uniformmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There exists another class of operators that can be used to interpret the logical implication based upon the residuation process [3,[11][12][13]. In the following we shall use R(a, b) to indicate this class of operations,…”
Section: Residuation Based Interpretationsmentioning
confidence: 99%