2011
DOI: 10.4236/ajibm.2011.11003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On Improving Replenishment Lot Size of an Integrated Manufacturing System with Discontinuous Issuing Policy and Imperfect Rework

Abstract: ABSTRACT

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, an alternative approach is adopted to reexamine Lee et al's model (2011) as stated earlier. To ease the readability, this study adopts the exact notation as used in Lee et al (2011). Description the model is as follows: consider a real life production system may produce x portion of random nonconforming items at a production rate d. Among nonconforming items, a θ portion is assumed to be scrap and the other (1 -θ) portion can be reworked at a rate P1, within the same cycle when regular production ends.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In this study, an alternative approach is adopted to reexamine Lee et al's model (2011) as stated earlier. To ease the readability, this study adopts the exact notation as used in Lee et al (2011). Description the model is as follows: consider a real life production system may produce x portion of random nonconforming items at a production rate d. Among nonconforming items, a θ portion is assumed to be scrap and the other (1 -θ) portion can be reworked at a rate P1, within the same cycle when regular production ends.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…E[TCU(Q)] = the long-run average costs per unit time for the proposed model. Figure 1 depicts producer's on-hand inventory of perfect quality items (Lee et al, 2011). Again, for the purpose of easing readability, this paper adopted the same basic formulations as that in Lee et al (2011).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations