Proceedings of the 2018 ACM International Joint Conference and 2018 International Symposium on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computi 2018
DOI: 10.1145/3267305.3274180
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On Indoor Human Sensing Using Commodity Radar

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In short, radar gesture performance studies deal little or nothing with user preferences, and preference studies deal little or nothing with performance. This paper reconciles performance with preference in the context of gestures recognized by a commodity radar [5] through multiple materials [32]. Nielsen [33] shed light on the debate between favoring preference and favoring performance, pointing out that the former is typically reported by subjective measures, while the latter is reported by objective measures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 71%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In short, radar gesture performance studies deal little or nothing with user preferences, and preference studies deal little or nothing with performance. This paper reconciles performance with preference in the context of gestures recognized by a commodity radar [5] through multiple materials [32]. Nielsen [33] shed light on the debate between favoring preference and favoring performance, pointing out that the former is typically reported by subjective measures, while the latter is reported by objective measures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Regarding GES1, the agreement rates are overall moderate in magnitude (M =0.24, SD=0.157), ranging between 0.074 (low) for ''Turn assistant help off'' and 0.536 (very high) for ''Answer help phone Call''. On the global sampling, 5 19 =26% of the rates belong to the low consensus category, 9 19 =47% of the rates belong to the moderate range, 3 19 =16% are high, and 2 19 =10% are very high. Apart from a few exceptions, most gestures received an agreement rate slightly higher or close to those reported in the GES literature ( [76] that summarized agreement rates of 18 GESs).…”
Section: ) Agreement Ratementioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations