2001
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-017-3722-7_7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On inherent inflection feeding derivation in Polish

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Russian, there are four types of adjectival participles, which can be cross-classified by two oppositions, active/passive and present/past (see, e.g., Isačenko 1962;Švedova 1970Schoorlemmer 1995;Borik 2002); consider table 1 with participles derived from the verb Polish also has four types of participles, two adjectival participles -active ącyparticiples and passive ny-/ty-participles -and two adverbial participles, anterior wszy/łszyparticiples and simultaneous ąc-participles (e.g. Damborský 1967a,b;Weiß 1977;Grzegorczykowa, Laskowski & Wróbel 1984;Cetnarowska 2000Cetnarowska , 2001Tokarski 2001). The distinction between anterior and simultaneous participles corresponds to the opposition past/present in table 1 and to the aspectual opposition perfective/imperfective (in fact, the distinction is based on relative tenses (i.e.…”
Section: Participles In Russian Polish and Czechmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Russian, there are four types of adjectival participles, which can be cross-classified by two oppositions, active/passive and present/past (see, e.g., Isačenko 1962;Švedova 1970Schoorlemmer 1995;Borik 2002); consider table 1 with participles derived from the verb Polish also has four types of participles, two adjectival participles -active ącyparticiples and passive ny-/ty-participles -and two adverbial participles, anterior wszy/łszyparticiples and simultaneous ąc-participles (e.g. Damborský 1967a,b;Weiß 1977;Grzegorczykowa, Laskowski & Wróbel 1984;Cetnarowska 2000Cetnarowska , 2001Tokarski 2001). The distinction between anterior and simultaneous participles corresponds to the opposition past/present in table 1 and to the aspectual opposition perfective/imperfective (in fact, the distinction is based on relative tenses (i.e.…”
Section: Participles In Russian Polish and Czechmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But if adverbial -ly is treated as inflectional then this fact forms part of the much larger, though not uncontroversial, generalisation whereby regular inflection cannot occur inside lexemes but is confined to their margins (Kiparsky 1982;Rainer 1996;Cetnarowska 2001). Adverb-forming -ly also cannot be followed by inflectional suffixes: recall * nicelier, * slowliest (and again contrast non-ly adverbs and non-adverbial -ly: sooner and manlier).…”
Section: Confinement To the Margins Of Lexemesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But if adverbial - ly is treated as inflectional then this fact forms part of the much larger, though not uncontroversial, generalisation whereby regular inflection cannot occur inside lexemes but is confined to their margins (Kiparsky 1982; Rainer 1996; Cetnarowska 2001). Thus, *eventsful , *peersless , *watches-maker , *rats-infested are ill-formed despite the fact that the embedded plural forms may be semantically warranted, while lexemes containing irregular inflection, such as headlice-repellent , mice-infested , are well-formed.…”
Section: Further Morphological Aspects Of the Inflection-like Behaviomentioning
confidence: 99%