2011
DOI: 10.1007/s13163-011-0087-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On interpolation of cocompact imbeddings

Abstract: Cocompactness is a useful weaker counterpart of compactness in the study of imbeddings between function spaces. In this paper we prove that, under quite general conditions, cocompactness of imbeddings of Banach spaces persists under both real and complex interpolation. As an application, we obtain that subcritical continuous imbeddings of fractional Sobolev spaces and Besov spaces are cocompact relative to lattice shifts. We deduce this by interpolating the known cocompact imbeddings for classical Sobolev spac… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For fractional s, the result follows from the continuity of Sobolev embeddings (see Strichartz [15]), the monotonicity of the Sobolev scale with respect to s, and the Hölder inequality. For M = R N , and 0 < s < 1, the cocompactness is verified in [3]. Thus, given the cocompactness of the embedding into L q (M ), Theorem 1.3 implies that, for any coercive compact subgroup Ω of I(M ), the Ω-invariant subspace of W s,p (M ) is compactly embedded into L q .…”
Section: Coercive Groupsmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For fractional s, the result follows from the continuity of Sobolev embeddings (see Strichartz [15]), the monotonicity of the Sobolev scale with respect to s, and the Hölder inequality. For M = R N , and 0 < s < 1, the cocompactness is verified in [3]. Thus, given the cocompactness of the embedding into L q (M ), Theorem 1.3 implies that, for any coercive compact subgroup Ω of I(M ), the Ω-invariant subspace of W s,p (M ) is compactly embedded into L q .…”
Section: Coercive Groupsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…If X * is dense in A * , then weak cocompactness is trivially equivalent to cocompactness as defined in earlier work, e.g. [3].…”
Section: Definition 12mentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Proof. By continuity of Φ − Φ 0 with respect to the weak convergence it suffices to prove (4.5) for Φ = Φ 0 , which can be immediately obtained by iteration of the Brezis-Lieb lemma (see [8], Appendix B, for the scalar case). Since the map Φ ′ − Φ ′ 0 is continuous with respect to the weak convergence, the conclusion that (U (n) , V (n) ) is a critical point for respective functional is immediate.…”
Section: Concentration Compactness Lemmamentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In general, one would also expect that, given a common set of gauges, interpolation of two imbeddings, X 0 ֒→ Y 0 , and X 1 ֒→ Y 1 , results in a cocompact imbedding, if one of this imbeddings is cocompact. We refer to [20] where a more specific statement is proved, under additional conditions, for functional spaces of R N , which is then applied to verify that subcritical imbeddings of Besov spaces B s p,q (R N ) ֒→ B s1 p1,q1 (R N ), q 1 ≥ q, 0 < 1 p − 1 p1 < s−s1 N , s 1 ≥ 0.…”
Section: Transitivity and Interpolationmentioning
confidence: 99%