2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.comgeo.2022.101879
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On interval decomposability of 2D persistence modules

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If a persistence module does decompose into a direct sum of interval modules, then one can define the persistence diagram as the multiset of interval summands as in the one parameter case. Asashiba et al [1] developed a criterion for determining if an n-parameter persistence module is interval decomposable, as well as providing an algorithm to check this criterion in the n = 2 setting. In [2], Ashashiba et al provide an approach to approximate a 2-parameter persistence module by an interval decomposable module, with the approximation retaining the same dimension function and rank function.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…If a persistence module does decompose into a direct sum of interval modules, then one can define the persistence diagram as the multiset of interval summands as in the one parameter case. Asashiba et al [1] developed a criterion for determining if an n-parameter persistence module is interval decomposable, as well as providing an algorithm to check this criterion in the n = 2 setting. In [2], Ashashiba et al provide an approach to approximate a 2-parameter persistence module by an interval decomposable module, with the approximation retaining the same dimension function and rank function.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If M is a persistence module over Z 2 , or a finite subset thereof, and I is a finite interval, we can use Dey et al's aforementioned algorithm to compute rank M (I). Even for a finite, small poset P ⊂ Z 2 , the size of Int(P ) can grow rapidly, see [1]. As a result, computing rank M (I) over all I ∈ Int(P ) is generally not practical.…”
Section: Our Contributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that [2] if part (2) of the definition is weakend to require only isomorphism, then the definition is weakened for modules that cannot be embedded in N m for m > 2.…”
Section: Multiparameter Persistence Modulesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“….}. 1 Note that this definition is opposite to the usual definition of the incidence algebra [23]. We adopt this multiplication to make it match up to the usual interpretation of composition of functions from the left.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By the discussion in Section 4.1 of [1], each interval I in I( #-G m,n ) has a "staircase" form, which was denoted by:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%